| tech,15-3-A97-1034,ak | SGML approach </term> compared with a <term> | non-SGML database approach | </term> . This paper addresses the problem | #28733 In particular we address the advantages and disadvantages of an SGML approach compared with anon-SGML database approach. | |
| tech,16-1-A97-1034,ak | </term> ( McKelvie et al , 1996 ) , an <term> | architecture | </term> for writing <term> corpus processing | #28676 This paper describes the LT NSL system (McKelvie et al, 1996), anarchitecture for writing corpus processing tools. | |
| tech,10-3-A97-1034,ak | advantages and disadvantages of an <term> | SGML approach | </term> compared with a <term> non-SGML database | #28728 In particular we address the advantages and disadvantages of anSGML approach compared with a non-SGML database approach. | |
| tech,8-2-A97-1034,ak | </term> is then compared with two other <term> | systems | </term> which address similar issues , the | #28691 This system is then compared with two othersystems which address similar issues, the GATE system (Cunningham et al, 1995) and the IMS Corpus Workbench (Christ, 1994). | |
| tool,15-2-A97-1034,ak | which address similar issues , the <term> | GATE system | </term> ( Cunningham et al , 1995 ) and the | #28698 This system is then compared with two other systems which address similar issues, theGATE system (Cunningham et al, 1995) and the IMS Corpus Workbench (Christ, 1994). | |
| tool,26-2-A97-1034,ak | Cunningham et al , 1995 ) and the <term> | IMS Corpus Workbench | </term> ( Christ , 1994 ) . In particular | #28709 This system is then compared with two other systems which address similar issues, the GATE system (Cunningham et al, 1995) and theIMS Corpus Workbench (Christ, 1994). | |
| tool,4-1-A97-1034,ak | analysis </term> . This paper describes the <term> | LT NSL system | </term> ( McKelvie et al , 1996 ) , an <term> | #28664 This paper describes theLT NSL system (McKelvie et al, 1996), an architecture for writing corpus processing tools. | |
| tech,1-2-A97-1034,ak | corpus processing tools </term> . This <term> | system | </term> is then compared with two other <term> | #28684 Thissystem is then compared with two other systems which address similar issues, the GATE system (Cunningham et al, 1995) and the IMS Corpus Workbench (Christ, 1994). | |
| tech,19-1-A97-1034,ak | <term> architecture </term> for writing <term> | corpus processing tools | </term> . This <term> system </term> is then | #28679 This paper describes the LT NSL system (McKelvie et al, 1996), an architecture for writingcorpus processing tools. |
