| other,12-5-P99-1062,ak | the method by the analysis of 300 <term> | test noun phrases | </term> . <term> STRAND </term> ( Resnik , 1998 | #31094 We illustrate the effectiveness of the method by the analysis of 300test noun phrases. | |
| model,4-3-P99-1062,ak | usage </term> . The method exploits a <term> | definition | </term> of N2 in a <term> dictionary </term> | #31057 The method exploits adefinition of N2 in a dictionary. | |
| lr,9-3-P99-1062,ak | a <term> definition </term> of N2 in a <term> | dictionary | </term> . For example , rugby no coach can | #31062 The method exploits a definition of N2 in adictionary. | |
| other,8-1-P99-1062,ak | presents a new method of analyzing <term> | Japanese noun phrases | </term> of the form N1 no N2 . The <term> Japanese | #31027 This paper presents a new method of analyzingJapanese noun phrases of the form N1 no N2. | |
| other,14-2-P99-1062,ak | corresponds to of , but it has much broader <term> | usage | </term> . The method exploits a <term> definition | #31051 The Japanese postposition no roughly corresponds to of, but it has much broaderusage. | |
| other,1-2-P99-1062,ak | phrases </term> of the form N1 no N2 . The <term> | Japanese postposition no | </term> roughly corresponds to of , but it | #31038 TheJapanese postposition no roughly corresponds to of, but it has much broader usage. |
