We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon
<term>
pragmatic information
</term>
, including
<term>
discourse content
</term>
and
<term>
conversational goals
</term>
, rather than upon precise
<term>
representations
</term>
of the preceding
<term>
utterance
</term>
alone .
#15988We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance uponpragmatic information, including discourse content and conversational goals, rather than upon precise representations of the preceding utterance alone.
other,9-2-P85-1024,ak
This paper presents a pragmatics-based framework for interpreting such
<term>
utterances
</term>
, including identification of the
<term>
speaker ' s
</term><term>
discourse goal
</term>
in employing the
<term>
fragment
</term>
.
#15960This paper presents a pragmatics-based framework for interpreting suchutterances, including identification of the speaker' s discourse goal in employing the fragment.
other,19-3-P85-1024,ak
We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon
<term>
pragmatic information
</term>
, including
<term>
discourse content
</term>
and
<term>
conversational goals
</term>
, rather than upon precise
<term>
representations
</term>
of the preceding
<term>
utterance
</term>
alone .
#15995We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon pragmatic information, including discourse content andconversational goals, rather than upon precise representations of the preceding utterance alone.
This paper presents a pragmatics-based framework for interpreting such
<term>
utterances
</term>
, including identification of the
<term>
speaker ' s
</term><term>
discourse goal
</term>
in employing the
<term>
fragment
</term>
.
#15974This paper presents a pragmatics-based framework for interpreting such utterances, including identification of the speaker' s discourse goal in employing thefragment.
other,30-3-P85-1024,ak
We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon
<term>
pragmatic information
</term>
, including
<term>
discourse content
</term>
and
<term>
conversational goals
</term>
, rather than upon precise
<term>
representations
</term>
of the preceding
<term>
utterance
</term>
alone .
#16006We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon pragmatic information, including discourse content and conversational goals, rather than upon precise representations of the precedingutterance alone.
other,16-3-P85-1024,ak
We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon
<term>
pragmatic information
</term>
, including
<term>
discourse content
</term>
and
<term>
conversational goals
</term>
, rather than upon precise
<term>
representations
</term>
of the preceding
<term>
utterance
</term>
alone .
#15992We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon pragmatic information, includingdiscourse content and conversational goals, rather than upon precise representations of the preceding utterance alone.
other,15-2-P85-1024,ak
This paper presents a pragmatics-based framework for interpreting such
<term>
utterances
</term>
, including identification of the
<term>
speaker ' s
</term><term>
discourse goal
</term>
in employing the
<term>
fragment
</term>
.
#15966This paper presents a pragmatics-based framework for interpreting such utterances, including identification of thespeaker ' s discourse goal in employing the fragment.
other,18-2-P85-1024,ak
This paper presents a pragmatics-based framework for interpreting such
<term>
utterances
</term>
, including identification of the
<term>
speaker ' s
</term><term>
discourse goal
</term>
in employing the
<term>
fragment
</term>
.
#15969This paper presents a pragmatics-based framework for interpreting such utterances, including identification of the speaker' sdiscourse goal in employing the fragment.
other,0-1-P85-1024,ak
This paper outlines
<term>
Plume
</term>
as it currently exists and describes our detailed design for extending
<term>
Plume
</term>
to handle
<term>
passives
</term>
,
<term>
relative clauses
</term>
, and
<term>
interrogatives
</term>
in a general manner .
<term>
Intersentential elliptical utterances
</term>
occur frequently in
<term>
information-seeking dialogues
</term>
.
#15942This paper outlines Plume as it currently exists and describes our detailed design for extending Plume to handle passives, relative clauses, and interrogatives in a general manner.Intersentential elliptical utterances occur frequently in information-seeking dialogues.
other,26-3-P85-1024,ak
We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon
<term>
pragmatic information
</term>
, including
<term>
discourse content
</term>
and
<term>
conversational goals
</term>
, rather than upon precise
<term>
representations
</term>
of the preceding
<term>
utterance
</term>
alone .
#16002We claim that the advantage of this approach is its reliance upon pragmatic information, including discourse content and conversational goals, rather than upon preciserepresentations of the preceding utterance alone.