Carnegie-Mellon University e.g. [ 4 , 5 , 8 ] ,
<term>
Plume 's
</term>
approach to
<term>
parsing
</term>
is
#15850Building on previous work at Carnegie-Mellon University e.g. [4, 5, 8],Plume 's approach to parsing is based on semantic caseframe instantiation.
other,20-5-P85-1019,ak
</term>
to handle
<term>
passives
</term>
,
<term>
relative clauses
</term>
, and
<term>
interrogatives
</term>
in
#15932This paper outlines Plume as it currently exists and describes our detailed design for extending Plume to handle passives,relative clauses, and interrogatives in a general manner.
other,16-4-P85-1019,ak
, it handles
<term>
passives
</term>
,
<term>
relative clauses
</term>
and
<term>
interrogatives
</term>
in
#15897While Plume is well adapted to simple declarative and imperative utterances, it handles passives,relative clauses and interrogatives in an ad hoc manner leading to patchy syntactic coverage.
tech,4-1-P85-1019,ak
languages
</term>
. We have implemented a
<term>
restricted domain parser
</term>
called
<term>
Plume
</term>
. Building
#15828We have implemented arestricted domain parser called Plume.
other,24-5-P85-1019,ak
<term>
relative clauses
</term>
, and
<term>
interrogatives
</term>
in a general manner .
<term>
Intersentential
#15936This paper outlines Plume as it currently exists and describes our detailed design for extending Plume to handle passives, relative clauses, andinterrogatives in a general manner.
other,11-3-P85-1019,ak
<term>
grammatical input
</term>
, and
<term>
robustness
</term>
in the face of
<term>
ungrammatical
#15873This has the advantages of efficiency on grammatical input, androbustness in the face of ungrammatical input.
other,19-4-P85-1019,ak
</term>
,
<term>
relative clauses
</term>
and
<term>
interrogatives
</term>
in an ad hoc manner leading to patchy
#15900While Plume is well adapted to simple declarative and imperative utterances, it handles passives, relative clauses andinterrogatives in an ad hoc manner leading to patchy syntactic coverage.
tool,8-1-P85-1019,ak
restricted domain parser
</term>
called
<term>
Plume
</term>
. Building on previous work at Carnegie-Mellon
#15832We have implemented a restricted domain parser calledPlume.
tool,15-5-P85-1019,ak
our detailed design for extending
<term>
Plume
</term>
to handle
<term>
passives
</term>
,
<term>
#15927This paper outlines Plume as it currently exists and describes our detailed design for extendingPlume to handle passives, relative clauses, and interrogatives in a general manner.
other,18-5-P85-1019,ak
extending
<term>
Plume
</term>
to handle
<term>
passives
</term>
,
<term>
relative clauses
</term>
, and
#15930This paper outlines Plume as it currently exists and describes our detailed design for extending Plume to handlepassives, relative clauses, and interrogatives in a general manner.
other,14-4-P85-1019,ak
imperative utterances
</term>
, it handles
<term>
passives
</term>
,
<term>
relative clauses
</term>
and
#15895While Plume is well adapted to simple declarative and imperative utterances, it handlespassives, relative clauses and interrogatives in an ad hoc manner leading to patchy syntactic coverage.
other,5-3-P85-1019,ak
</term>
. This has the advantages of
<term>
efficiency
</term>
on
<term>
grammatical input
</term>
,
#15867This has the advantages ofefficiency on grammatical input, and robustness in the face of ungrammatical input.
other,16-3-P85-1019,ak
<term>
robustness
</term>
in the face of
<term>
ungrammatical input
</term>
. While
<term>
Plume
</term>
is well
#15878This has the advantages of efficiency on grammatical input, and robustness in the face ofungrammatical input.
tech,24-2-P85-1019,ak
to
<term>
parsing
</term>
is based on
<term>
semantic caseframe instantiation
</term>
. This has the advantages of
<term>
#15858Building on previous work at Carnegie-Mellon University e.g. [4, 5, 8], Plume's approach to parsing is based onsemantic caseframe instantiation.
other,7-3-P85-1019,ak
advantages of
<term>
efficiency
</term>
on
<term>
grammatical input
</term>
, and
<term>
robustness
</term>
in the
#15869This has the advantages of efficiency ongrammatical input, and robustness in the face of ungrammatical input.
tool,3-5-P85-1019,ak
coverage
</term>
. This paper outlines
<term>
Plume
</term>
as it currently exists and describes
#15915This paper outlinesPlume as it currently exists and describes our detailed design for extending Plume to handle passives, relative clauses, and interrogatives in a general manner.
other,28-4-P85-1019,ak
an ad hoc manner leading to patchy
<term>
syntactic coverage
</term>
. This paper outlines
<term>
Plume
</term>
#15909While Plume is well adapted to simple declarative and imperative utterances, it handles passives, relative clauses and interrogatives in an ad hoc manner leading to patchysyntactic coverage.
other,7-4-P85-1019,ak
Plume
</term>
is well adapted to simple
<term>
declarative and imperative utterances
</term>
, it handles
<term>
passives
</term>
#15888While Plume is well adapted to simpledeclarative and imperative utterances, it handles passives, relative clauses and interrogatives in an ad hoc manner leading to patchy syntactic coverage.
tech,20-2-P85-1019,ak
,
<term>
Plume 's
</term>
approach to
<term>
parsing
</term>
is based on
<term>
semantic caseframe
#15854Building on previous work at Carnegie-Mellon University e.g. [4, 5, 8], Plume's approach toparsing is based on semantic caseframe instantiation.
tool,1-4-P85-1019,ak
<term>
ungrammatical input
</term>
. While
<term>
Plume
</term>
is well adapted to simple
<term>
declarative
#15882WhilePlume is well adapted to simple declarative and imperative utterances, it handles passives, relative clauses and interrogatives in an ad hoc manner leading to patchy syntactic coverage.