#16679Such mistakes can slow, and possibly break down,communication.
other,8-9-J86-4002,ak
paper also promotes a new view for
<term>
extensional reference
</term>
. We examine the relationship between
#16760The paper also promotes a new view forextensional reference.
other,21-7-J86-4002,ak
study and techniques for avoiding
<term>
failures of reference
</term>
. We want to illustrate a framework
#16715This paper highlights a particular class of miscommunication --- reference problems --- by describing a case study and techniques for avoidingfailures of reference.
tech,9-1-J86-4002,ak
of this work is the enrichment of
<term>
human-machine interactions
</term>
in a
<term>
natural language environment
#16585The goal of this work is the enrichment ofhuman-machine interactions in a natural language environment.
other,4-2-J86-4002,ak
. Because a
<term>
speaker
</term>
and
<term>
listener
</term>
can not be assured to have the same
#16597Because a speaker andlistener cannot be assured to have the same beliefs, contexts, perceptions, backgrounds, or goals, at each point in a conversation, difficulties and mistakes arise when a listener interprets a speaker's utterance.
other,37-2-J86-4002,ak
difficulties and mistakes arise when a
<term>
listener
</term>
interprets a
<term>
speaker 's utterance
#16630Because a speaker and listener cannot be assured to have the same beliefs, contexts, perceptions, backgrounds, or goals, at each point in a conversation, difficulties and mistakes arise when alistener interprets a speaker's utterance.
other,12-3-J86-4002,ak
misunderstandings between
<term>
speaker
</term>
and
<term>
listener
</term>
, including
<term>
reference failures
#16649These mistakes can lead to various kinds of misunderstandings between speaker andlistener, including reference failures or failure to understand the speaker's intention.
other,7-7-J86-4002,ak
paper highlights a particular class of
<term>
miscommunication
</term>
---
<term>
reference problems
</term>
#16701This paper highlights a particular class ofmiscommunication --- reference problems --- by describing a case study and techniques for avoiding failures of reference.
other,4-4-J86-4002,ak
</term>
. We call these misunderstandings
<term>
miscommunication
</term>
. Such mistakes can slow , and possibly
#16667We call these misunderstandingsmiscommunication.
other,8-6-J86-4002,ak
goal is to recognize and isolate such
<term>
miscommunications
</term>
and circumvent them . This paper
#16689Our goal is to recognize and isolate suchmiscommunications and circumvent them.
other,13-1-J86-4002,ak
human-machine interactions
</term>
in a
<term>
natural language environment
</term>
. Because a
<term>
speaker
</term>
and
#16589The goal of this work is the enrichment of human-machine interactions in anatural language environment.
other,15-3-J86-4002,ak
and
<term>
listener
</term>
, including
<term>
reference failures
</term>
or failure to understand the
<term>
#16652These mistakes can lead to various kinds of misunderstandings between speaker and listener, includingreference failures or failure to understand the speaker's intention.
other,9-7-J86-4002,ak
of
<term>
miscommunication
</term>
---
<term>
reference problems
</term>
--- by describing a case study and
#16703This paper highlights a particular class of miscommunication ---reference problems --- by describing a case study and techniques for avoiding failures of reference.
other,14-8-J86-4002,ak
restrictive than earlier ones by allowing a
<term>
speaker
</term>
leeway in forming an
<term>
utterance
#16733We want to illustrate a framework less restrictive than earlier ones by allowing aspeaker leeway in forming an utterance about a task and in determining the conversational vehicle to deliver it.
other,10-3-J86-4002,ak
kinds of misunderstandings between
<term>
speaker
</term>
and
<term>
listener
</term>
, including
#16647These mistakes can lead to various kinds of misunderstandings betweenspeaker and listener, including reference failures or failure to understand the speaker's intention.
other,2-2-J86-4002,ak
language environment
</term>
. Because a
<term>
speaker
</term>
and
<term>
listener
</term>
can not be
#16595Because aspeaker and listener cannot be assured to have the same beliefs, contexts, perceptions, backgrounds, or goals, at each point in a conversation, difficulties and mistakes arise when a listener interprets a speaker's utterance.
other,22-3-J86-4002,ak
</term>
or failure to understand the
<term>
speaker 's intention
</term>
. We call these misunderstandings
#16659These mistakes can lead to various kinds of misunderstandings between speaker and listener, including reference failures or failure to understand thespeaker 's intention.
other,40-2-J86-4002,ak
a
<term>
listener
</term>
interprets a
<term>
speaker 's utterance
</term>
. These mistakes can lead to various
#16633Because a speaker and listener cannot be assured to have the same beliefs, contexts, perceptions, backgrounds, or goals, at each point in a conversation, difficulties and mistakes arise when a listener interprets aspeaker 's utterance.
other,19-8-J86-4002,ak
speaker
</term>
leeway in forming an
<term>
utterance
</term>
about a task and in determining the
#16738We want to illustrate a framework less restrictive than earlier ones by allowing a speaker leeway in forming anutterance about a task and in determining the conversational vehicle to deliver it.