#16452The theory of attention,intention, and aggregation of utterances is illustrated in the paper with a number of example discourses.
other,20-7-J86-3001,ak
</term>
as
<term>
cue phrases
</term>
,
<term>
referring expressions
</term>
, and
<term>
interruptions
</term>
.
#16441The distinction among these components is essential to provide an adequate explanation of such discourse phenomena as cue phrases,referring expressions, and interruptions.
other,16-9-J86-3001,ak
behaviour of
<term>
cue phrases
</term>
,
<term>
referring expressions
</term>
, and
<term>
interruptions
</term>
are
#16486Various properties of discourse are described, and explanations for the behaviour of cue phrases,referring expressions, and interruptions are explored.
other,25-11-J86-3001,ak
</term>
and the relationships among
<term>
intentions
</term>
, and tracking the
<term>
discourse
#16534Discourse processing requires recognizing how the utterances of the discourse aggregate into segments, recognizing the intentions expressed in the discourse and the relationships amongintentions, and tracking the discourse through the operation of the mechanisms associated with attentional state.
other,1-6-J86-3001,ak
<term>
discourse
</term>
unfolds . The
<term>
attentional state
</term>
, being dynamic , records the objects
#16397Theattentional state, being dynamic, records the objects, properties, and relations that are salient at each point of the discourse.
other,5-4-J86-3001,ak
intentional structure
</term>
captures the
<term>
discourse-relevant purposes
</term>
, expressed in each of the
<term>
linguistic
#16360The intentional structure captures thediscourse-relevant purposes, expressed in each of the linguistic segments as well as relationships among them.
other,3-8-J86-3001,ak
interruptions
</term>
. The theory of
<term>
attention
</term>
,
<term>
intention
</term>
, and aggregation
#16450The theory ofattention, intention, and aggregation of utterances is illustrated in the paper with a number of example discourses.
other,12-11-J86-3001,ak
<term>
discourse
</term>
aggregate into
<term>
segments
</term>
, recognizing the
<term>
intentions
#16521Discourse processing requires recognizing how the utterances of the discourse aggregate intosegments, recognizing the intentions expressed in the discourse and the relationships among intentions, and tracking the discourse through the operation of the mechanisms associated with attentional state.
other,17-7-J86-3001,ak
<term>
discourse phenomena
</term>
as
<term>
cue phrases
</term>
,
<term>
referring expressions
</term>
#16438The distinction among these components is essential to provide an adequate explanation of such discourse phenomena ascue phrases, referring expressions, and interruptions.
other,13-9-J86-3001,ak
explanations for the behaviour of
<term>
cue phrases
</term>
,
<term>
referring expressions
</term>
#16483Various properties of discourse are described, and explanations for the behaviour ofcue phrases, referring expressions, and interruptions are explored.
other,13-10-J86-3001,ak
</term>
of
<term>
utterances
</term>
in a
<term>
discourse
</term>
.
<term>
Discourse processing
</term>
#16507This theory provides a framework for describing the processing of utterances in adiscourse.
other,20-1-J86-3001,ak
</term>
and
<term>
processing
</term>
in
<term>
discourse
</term>
. In this theory ,
<term>
discourse
#16283In this paper we explore a new theory of discourse structure that stresses the role of purpose and processing indiscourse.
other,23-6-J86-3001,ak
that are salient at each point of the
<term>
discourse
</term>
. The distinction among these components
#16419The attentional state, being dynamic, records the objects, properties, and relations that are salient at each point of thediscourse.
other,23-12-J86-3001,ak
participants ' knowledge
</term>
of the
<term>
domain
</term>
. The goal of this work is the enrichment
#16574This processing description specifies in these recognition tasks the role of information from the discourse and from the participants' knowledge of thedomain.
other,24-7-J86-3001,ak
<term>
referring expressions
</term>
, and
<term>
interruptions
</term>
. The theory of
<term>
attention
</term>
#16445The distinction among these components is essential to provide an adequate explanation of such discourse phenomena as cue phrases, referring expressions, andinterruptions.
other,39-11-J86-3001,ak
of the mechanisms associated with
<term>
attentional state
</term>
. This processing description specifies
#16548Discourse processing requires recognizing how the utterances of the discourse aggregate into segments, recognizing the intentions expressed in the discourse and the relationships among intentions, and tracking the discourse through the operation of the mechanisms associated withattentional state.
other,21-8-J86-3001,ak
the paper with a number of example
<term>
discourses
</term>
. Various properties of
<term>
discourse
#16468The theory of attention, intention, and aggregation of utterances is illustrated in the paper with a number of examplediscourses.
other,46-2-J86-3001,ak
</term>
) , and the state of focus of
<term>
attention
</term>
( called the
<term>
attentional state
#16331In this theory, discourse structure is composed of three separate but interrelated components: the structure of the sequence of utterances (called the linguistic structure), a structure of purposes (called the intentional structure), and the state of focus ofattention (called the attentional state).
other,32-2-J86-3001,ak
structure
</term>
) , a structure of
<term>
purposes
</term>
( called the
<term>
intentional structure
#16317In this theory, discourse structure is composed of three separate but interrelated components: the structure of the sequence of utterances (called the linguistic structure), a structure ofpurposes (called the intentional structure), and the state of focus of attention (called the attentional state).
other,21-2-J86-3001,ak
: the structure of the sequence of
<term>
utterances
</term>
( called the
<term>
linguistic structure
#16306In this theory, discourse structure is composed of three separate but interrelated components: the structure of the sequence ofutterances (called the linguistic structure), a structure of purposes (called the intentional structure), and the state of focus of attention (called the attentional state).