lr,34-1-I05-2021,bq |
WSD evaluation methodology
</term>
and
<term>
|
datasets
|
</term>
from the
<term>
Senseval-3 Chinese
|
#7820
We present the first known empirical test of an increasingly common speculative claim, by evaluating a representative Chinese-to-English SMT model directly on word sense disambiguation performance, using standard WSD evaluation methodology anddatasets from the Senseval-3 Chinese lexical sample task. |
tech,16-6-I05-2021,bq |
speculative claims to the contrary , current
<term>
|
SMT models
|
</term>
do have limitations in comparison
|
#7960
This tends to support the view that despite recent speculative claims to the contrary, currentSMT models do have limitations in comparison with dedicated WSD models, and that SMT should benefit from the better predictions made by the WSD models. |
tech,10-2-I05-2021,bq |
designing and evaluating dedicated
<term>
|
word sense disambiguation ( WSD ) models
|
</term>
, in particular with the
<term>
Senseval
|
#7839
Much effort has been put in designing and evaluating dedicatedword sense disambiguation ( WSD ) models, in particular with the Senseval series of workshops. |
tech,23-5-I05-2021,bq |
lower than that of all the dedicated
<term>
|
WSD models
|
</term>
considered . This tends to support
|
#7940
We present controlled experiments showing the WSD accuracy of current typical SMT models to be significantly lower than that of all the dedicatedWSD models considered. |
tech,20-4-I05-2021,bq |
compared with that of the dedicated
<term>
|
WSD models
|
</term>
. We present controlled experiments
|
#7914
Surprisingly however, the WSD accuracy of SMT models has never been evaluated and compared with that of the dedicatedWSD models. |
tech,25-6-I05-2021,bq |
limitations in comparison with dedicated
<term>
|
WSD models
|
</term>
, and that
<term>
SMT
</term>
should
|
#7969
This tends to support the view that despite recent speculative claims to the contrary, current SMT models do have limitations in comparison with dedicatedWSD models, and that SMT should benefit from the better predictions made by the WSD models. |
other,34-3-I05-2021,bq |
translation
</term>
of the
<term>
words
</term>
in
<term>
|
source language sentences
|
</term>
. Surprisingly however , the
<term>
|
#7890
At the same time, the recent improvements in the BLEU scores of statistical machine translation (SMT) suggests that SMT models are good at predicting the right translation of the words insource language sentences. |
measure(ment),5-1-I05-2021,bq |
</term>
. We present the first known
<term>
|
empirical test
|
</term>
of an increasingly common speculative
|
#7791
We present the first knownempirical test of an increasingly common speculative claim, by evaluating a representative Chinese-to-English SMT model directly on word sense disambiguation performance, using standard WSD evaluation methodology and datasets from the Senseval-3 Chinese lexical sample task. |
tech,7-4-I05-2021,bq |
<term>
WSD
</term><term>
accuracy
</term>
of
<term>
|
SMT models
|
</term>
has never been evaluated and compared
|
#7901
Surprisingly however, the WSD accuracy ofSMT models has never been evaluated and compared with that of the dedicated WSD models. |
tech,13-3-I05-2021,bq |
improvements in the
<term>
BLEU scores
</term>
of
<term>
|
statistical machine translation ( SMT )
|
</term>
suggests that
<term>
SMT models
</term>
|
#7869
At the same time, the recent improvements in the BLEU scores ofstatistical machine translation ( SMT ) suggests that SMT models are good at predicting the right translation of the words in source language sentences. |
measure(ment),23-1-I05-2021,bq |
Chinese-to-English SMT model
</term>
directly on
<term>
|
word sense disambiguation performance
|
</term>
, using standard
<term>
WSD evaluation
|
#7809
We present the first known empirical test of an increasingly common speculative claim, by evaluating a representative Chinese-to-English SMT model directly onword sense disambiguation performance, using standard WSD evaluation methodology and datasets from the Senseval-3 Chinese lexical sample task. |
model,18-1-I05-2021,bq |
claim , by evaluating a representative
<term>
|
Chinese-to-English SMT model
|
</term>
directly on
<term>
word sense disambiguation
|
#7804
We present the first known empirical test of an increasingly common speculative claim, by evaluating a representativeChinese-to-English SMT model directly on word sense disambiguation performance, using standard WSD evaluation methodology and datasets from the Senseval-3 Chinese lexical sample task. |
other,29-3-I05-2021,bq |
</term>
are good at predicting the right
<term>
|
translation
|
</term>
of the
<term>
words
</term>
in
<term>
source
|
#7885
At the same time, the recent improvements in the BLEU scores of statistical machine translation (SMT) suggests that SMT models are good at predicting the righttranslation of the words in source language sentences. |
measure(ment),30-1-I05-2021,bq |
performance
</term>
, using standard
<term>
|
WSD evaluation methodology
|
</term>
and
<term>
datasets
</term>
from the
<term>
|
#7816
We present the first known empirical test of an increasingly common speculative claim, by evaluating a representative Chinese-to-English SMT model directly on word sense disambiguation performance, using standardWSD evaluation methodology and datasets from the Senseval-3 Chinese lexical sample task. |
tech,30-6-I05-2021,bq |
dedicated
<term>
WSD models
</term>
, and that
<term>
|
SMT
|
</term>
should benefit from the better predictions
|
#7974
This tends to support the view that despite recent speculative claims to the contrary, current SMT models do have limitations in comparison with dedicated WSD models, and thatSMT should benefit from the better predictions made by the WSD models. |
tech,21-3-I05-2021,bq |
translation ( SMT )
</term>
suggests that
<term>
|
SMT models
|
</term>
are good at predicting the right
<term>
|
#7877
At the same time, the recent improvements in the BLEU scores of statistical machine translation (SMT) suggests thatSMT models are good at predicting the right translation of the words in source language sentences. |
tech,4-4-I05-2021,bq |
</term>
. Surprisingly however , the
<term>
|
WSD
|
</term><term>
accuracy
</term>
of
<term>
SMT
|
#7898
Surprisingly however, theWSD accuracy of SMT models has never been evaluated and compared with that of the dedicated WSD models. |
tech,40-6-I05-2021,bq |
the better predictions made by the
<term>
|
WSD models
|
</term>
.
<term>
Statistical machine translation
|
#7984
This tends to support the view that despite recent speculative claims to the contrary, current SMT models do have limitations in comparison with dedicated WSD models, and that SMT should benefit from the better predictions made by theWSD models. |
other,37-1-I05-2021,bq |
</term>
and
<term>
datasets
</term>
from the
<term>
|
Senseval-3 Chinese lexical sample task
|
</term>
. Much effort has been put in designing
|
#7823
We present the first known empirical test of an increasingly common speculative claim, by evaluating a representative Chinese-to-English SMT model directly on word sense disambiguation performance, using standard WSD evaluation methodology and datasets from theSenseval-3 Chinese lexical sample task. |
measure(ment),10-3-I05-2021,bq |
time , the recent improvements in the
<term>
|
BLEU scores
|
</term>
of
<term>
statistical machine translation
|
#7866
At the same time, the recent improvements in theBLEU scores of statistical machine translation (SMT) suggests that SMT models are good at predicting the right translation of the words in source language sentences. |