| lr,1-4-H89-1036,ak | <term> elementary structure </term> . The <term> | ' grammar ' | </term> consists of a <term> lexicon </term> | #19588 The' grammar ' consists of a lexicon where each lexical item is associated with a finite number of structures for which that item is the head. | |
| lr,1-8-H89-1036,ak | be said to be ' lexicalized ' . A <term> | ' lexicalized ' grammar | </term> naturally follows from the <term> extended | #19655 A' lexicalized ' grammar naturally follows from the extended domain of locality of TAGs. | |
| lr,5-9-H89-1036,ak | general <term> parsing strategy </term> for <term> | ' lexicalized ' grammars | </term> is discussed . In the first stage | #19675 A general parsing strategy for' lexicalized ' grammars is discussed. | |
| model,6-6-H89-1036,ak | rules </term> . There are , of course , <term> | ' rules ' | </term> which tell us how these structures | #19628 There are, of course,' rules ' which tell us how these structures are composed. | |
| other,8-13-H89-1036,ak | unification formalisms </term> that have a <term> | CFG skeleton | </term> and that have a <term> TAG skeleton | #19753 The system parses unification formalisms that have aCFG skeleton and that have a TAG skeleton. | |
| model,17-2-H89-1036,ak | context-free grammar </term> ) over which <term> | constraints | </term> can be stated . These <term> constraints | #19559 These structures specify extended domains of locality (as compared to a context-free grammar) over whichconstraints can be stated. | |
| model,1-3-H89-1036,ak | constraints </term> can be stated . These <term> | constraints | </term> either hold within the <term> elementary | #19565 Theseconstraints either hold within the elementary structure itself or specify what other structures can be composed with a given elementary structure. | |
| other,12-2-H89-1036,ak | locality </term> ( as compared to a <term> | context-free grammar | </term> ) over which <term> constraints </term> | #19554 These structures specify extended domains of locality (as compared to acontext-free grammar) over which constraints can be stated. | |
| tech,1-11-H89-1036,ak | parsed with respect to this set . An <term> | Earley-type parser | </term> for <term> TAGs </term> has been has | #19721 AnEarley-type parser for TAGs has been has been developed. | |
| tech,6-14-H89-1036,ak | . Along with the development of an <term> | Earley-type parser | </term> for <term> TAGs </term> , <term> lexicons | #19768 Along with the development of anEarley-type parser for TAGs, lexicons for English are under development. | |
| other,5-1-H89-1036,ak | performance . In our approach , each <term> | elementary structure | </term> is systematically associated with | #19532 In our approach, eachelementary structure is systematically associated with a lexical head. | |
| other,6-3-H89-1036,ak | constraints </term> either hold within the <term> | elementary structure | </term> itself or specify what other structures | #19570 These constraints either hold within theelementary structure itself or specify what other structures can be composed with a given elementary structure. | |
| other,20-3-H89-1036,ak | structures can be composed with a given <term> | elementary structure | </term> . The <term> ' grammar ' </term> consists | #19584 These constraints either hold within the elementary structure itself or specify what other structures can be composed with a givenelementary structure. | |
| other,11-10-H89-1036,ak | <term> parser </term> selects a set of <term> | elementary structures | </term> associated with the <term> lexical | #19693 In the first stage, the parser selects a set ofelementary structures associated with the lexical items in the input sentence, and in the second stage the sentence is parsed with respect to this set. | |
| other,13-14-H89-1036,ak | TAGs </term> , <term> lexicons </term> for <term> | English | </term> are under development . A <term> lexicons | #19775 Along with the development of an Earley-type parser for TAGs, lexicons forEnglish are under development. | |
| other,12-18-H89-1036,ak | representing them semantically as one <term> | entry | </term> . We finally show how they can be | #19824 We assign them regular syntactic structures while representing them semantically as oneentry. | |
| other,9-8-H89-1036,ak | grammar </term> naturally follows from the <term> | extended domain of locality | </term> of <term> TAGs </term> . A general <term> | #19663 A 'lexicalized' grammar naturally follows from theextended domain of locality of TAGs. | |
| other,3-2-H89-1036,ak | head </term> . These structures specify <term> | extended domains of locality | </term> ( as compared to a <term> context-free | #19545 These structures specifyextended domains of locality (as compared to a context-free grammar) over which constraints can be stated. | |
| other,3-15-H89-1036,ak | development . A <term> lexicons </term> for <term> | French | </term> is also being developed . Subsets | #19783 A lexicons forFrench is also being developed. | |
| lr,1-7-H89-1036,ak | these structures are composed . A <term> | grammar | </term> of this form will be said to be ' | #19641 Agrammar of this form will be said to be 'lexicalized'. |
