| tech,0-2-A94-1007,ak | the equivalent <term> words </term> . <term> | Syntactic analysis | </term> of the <term> English coordinate sentences | #25584 The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words.Syntactic analysis of the English coordinate sentences is one of the most difficult problems for machine translation (MT) systems. | |
| measure(ment),18-7-A94-1007,ak | system </term> , and provided about 75 % <term> | accuracy | </term> in the practical translation use | #25761 This model was practically implemented and incorporated into the English-Japanese MT system, and provided about 75%accuracy in the practical translation use. | |
| tech,6-6-A94-1007,ak | The <term> model </term> is based on a <term> | balance matching operation | </term> for two lists of the <term> feature | #25706 The model is based on abalance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| model,4-5-A94-1007,ak | notations . This paper presents an <term> | English coordinate structure analysis model | </term> , which provides <term> top-down scope | #25673 This paper presents anEnglish coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism. | |
| other,7-1-A94-1007,ak | authors propose a model for analyzing <term> | English sentences | </term> including <term> coordinate conjunctions | #25567 The authors propose a model for analyzingEnglish sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words. | |
| tech,40-6-A94-1007,ak | </term> of <term> ellipses </term> , and <term> | robust analysis | </term> . This <term> model </term> was practically | #25740 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, androbust analysis. | |
| model,12-3-A94-1007,ak | <term> candidates </term> , the correct <term> | syntactic structure | </term> formed by an individual <term> coordinate | #25618 The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correctsyntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction. | |
| model,18-5-A94-1007,ak | scope information </term> of the correct <term> | syntactic structure | </term> by taking advantage of the symmetric | #25687 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correctsyntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism. | |
| other,22-1-A94-1007,ak | and , or , but and the equivalent <term> | words | </term> . <term> Syntactic analysis </term> of | #25582 The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalentwords. | |
| tech,15-2-A94-1007,ak | of the most difficult problems for <term> | machine translation ( MT ) systems | </term> . The problem is selecting , from | #25599 Syntactic analysis of the English coordinate sentences is one of the most difficult problems formachine translation ( MT ) systems. | |
| other,10-1-A94-1007,ak | <term> English sentences </term> including <term> | coordinate conjunctions | </term> such as and , or , but and the equivalent | #25570 The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences includingcoordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words. | |
| other,18-3-A94-1007,ak | structure </term> formed by an individual <term> | coordinate conjunction | </term> , i.e. determining which <term> constituents | #25624 The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individualcoordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction. | |
| tech,31-6-A94-1007,ak | analysis cost </term> , the improvement of <term> | word disambiguation | </term> , the <term> interpretation </term> of | #25731 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement ofword disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| other,37-6-A94-1007,ak | , the <term> interpretation </term> of <term> | ellipses | </term> , and <term> robust analysis </term> | #25737 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation ofellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| other,25-6-A94-1007,ak | provides four effects : the reduction of <term> | analysis cost | </term> , the improvement of <term> word disambiguation | #25725 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction ofanalysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| other,8-3-A94-1007,ak | problem is selecting , from all possible <term> | candidates | </term> , the correct <term> syntactic structure | #25614 The problem is selecting, from all possiblecandidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction. | |
| model,5-4-A94-1007,ak | </term> . Typically , so many possible <term> | structures | </term> are produced that <term> MT systems | #25642 Typically, so many possiblestructures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if the grammars allow to write the rules in the simple notations. | |
| other,12-5-A94-1007,ak | analysis model </term> , which provides <term> | top-down scope information | </term> of the correct <term> syntactic structure | #25681 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which providestop-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism. | |
| other,26-5-A94-1007,ak | taking advantage of the symmetric <term> | patterns | </term> of the <term> parallelism </term> . The | #25695 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetricpatterns of the parallelism. | |
| tech,9-4-A94-1007,ak | structures </term> are produced that <term> | MT systems | </term> can not select the correct one , | #25646 Typically, so many possible structures are produced thatMT systems cannot select the correct one, even if the grammars allow to write the rules in the simple notations. |
