| tool,6-1-I05-2013,ak | </term> . We present a tool , called <term> | ILIMP | </term> , which takes as <term> input </term> | #6085 We present a tool, calledILIMP, which takes as input a raw text in French and produces as output the same text in which every occurrence of the pronoun il is tagged either with tag [ANA] for anaphoric or [IMP] for impersonal or expletive. | |
| other,11-1-I05-2013,ak | <term> ILIMP </term> , which takes as <term> | input | </term> a <term> raw text </term> in <term> French | #6090 We present a tool, called ILIMP, which takes asinput a raw text in French and produces as output the same text in which every occurrence of the pronoun il is tagged either with tag [ANA] for anaphoric or [IMP] for impersonal or expletive. | |
| other,13-1-I05-2013,ak | which takes as <term> input </term> a <term> | raw text | </term> in <term> French </term> and produces | #6092 We present a tool, called ILIMP, which takes as input araw text in French and produces as output the same text in which every occurrence of the pronoun il is tagged either with tag [ANA] for anaphoric or [IMP] for impersonal or expletive. | |
| other,16-1-I05-2013,ak | input </term> a <term> raw text </term> in <term> | French | </term> and produces as <term> output </term> | #6095 We present a tool, called ILIMP, which takes as input a raw text inFrench and produces as output the same text in which every occurrence of the pronoun il is tagged either with tag [ANA] for anaphoric or [IMP] for impersonal or expletive. | |
| other,20-1-I05-2013,ak | <term> French </term> and produces as <term> | output | </term> the same <term> text </term> in which | #6099 We present a tool, called ILIMP, which takes as input a raw text in French and produces asoutput the same text in which every occurrence of the pronoun il is tagged either with tag [ANA] for anaphoric or [IMP] for impersonal or expletive. | |
| other,23-1-I05-2013,ak | produces as <term> output </term> the same <term> | text | </term> in which every <term> occurrence </term> | #6102 We present a tool, called ILIMP, which takes as input a raw text in French and produces as output the sametext in which every occurrence of the pronoun il is tagged either with tag [ANA] for anaphoric or [IMP] for impersonal or expletive. | |
| other,27-1-I05-2013,ak | same <term> text </term> in which every <term> | occurrence | </term> of the <term> pronoun </term> il is tagged | #6106 We present a tool, called ILIMP, which takes as input a raw text in French and produces as output the same text in which everyoccurrence of the pronoun il is tagged either with tag [ANA] for anaphoric or [IMP] for impersonal or expletive. | |
| other,30-1-I05-2013,ak | every <term> occurrence </term> of the <term> | pronoun | </term> il is tagged either with <term> tag | #6109 We present a tool, called ILIMP, which takes as input a raw text in French and produces as output the same text in which every occurrence of thepronoun il is tagged either with tag [ANA] for anaphoric or [IMP] for impersonal or expletive. | |
| other,36-1-I05-2013,ak | pronoun </term> il is tagged either with <term> | tag | </term> [ ANA ] for anaphoric or [ IMP ] | #6115 We present a tool, called ILIMP, which takes as input a raw text in French and produces as output the same text in which every occurrence of the pronoun il is tagged either withtag [ANA] for anaphoric or [IMP] for impersonal or expletive. | |
| other,9-2-I05-2013,ak | designed to distinguish between the <term> | anaphoric occurrences | </term> of il , for which an <term> anaphora | #6139 This tool is therefore designed to distinguish between theanaphoric occurrences of il, for which an anaphora resolution system has to look for an antecedent, and the expletive occurrences of this pronoun, for which it does not make sense to look for an antecedent. | |
| tech,17-2-I05-2013,ak | occurrences </term> of il , for which an <term> | anaphora resolution system | </term> has to look for an <term> antecedent | #6147 This tool is therefore designed to distinguish between the anaphoric occurrences of il, for which ananaphora resolution system has to look for an antecedent, and the expletive occurrences of this pronoun, for which it does not make sense to look for an antecedent. | |
| other,25-2-I05-2013,ak | resolution system </term> has to look for an <term> | antecedent | </term> , and the <term> expletive occurrences | #6155 This tool is therefore designed to distinguish between the anaphoric occurrences of il, for which an anaphora resolution system has to look for anantecedent, and the expletive occurrences of this pronoun, for which it does not make sense to look for an antecedent. | |
| other,29-2-I05-2013,ak | an <term> antecedent </term> , and the <term> | expletive occurrences | </term> of this <term> pronoun </term> , for | #6159 This tool is therefore designed to distinguish between the anaphoric occurrences of il, for which an anaphora resolution system has to look for an antecedent, and theexpletive occurrences of this pronoun, for which it does not make sense to look for an antecedent. | |
| other,33-2-I05-2013,ak | expletive occurrences </term> of this <term> | pronoun | </term> , for which it does not make sense | #6163 This tool is therefore designed to distinguish between the anaphoric occurrences of il, for which an anaphora resolution system has to look for an antecedent, and the expletive occurrences of thispronoun, for which it does not make sense to look for an antecedent. | |
| other,46-2-I05-2013,ak | does not make sense to look for an <term> | antecedent | </term> . The <term> precision rate </term> for | #6176 This tool is therefore designed to distinguish between the anaphoric occurrences of il, for which an anaphora resolution system has to look for an antecedent, and the expletive occurrences of this pronoun, for which it does not make sense to look for anantecedent. | |
| measure(ment),1-3-I05-2013,ak | for an <term> antecedent </term> . The <term> | precision rate | </term> for <term> ILIMP </term> is 97,5 % . | #6179 Theprecision rate for ILIMP is 97,5%. | |
| tool,4-3-I05-2013,ak | The <term> precision rate </term> for <term> | ILIMP | </term> is 97,5 % . The few <term> errors </term> | #6182 The precision rate forILIMP is 97,5%. | |
| other,2-4-I05-2013,ak | <term> ILIMP </term> is 97,5 % . The few <term> | errors | </term> are analyzed in detail . Other tasks | #6189 The fewerrors are analyzed in detail. | |
| tool,7-5-I05-2013,ak | tasks using the method developed for <term> | ILIMP | </term> are described briefly , as well as | #6202 Other tasks using the method developed forILIMP are described briefly, as well as the use of ILIMP in a modular syntactic analysis system. | |
| tool,18-5-I05-2013,ak | described briefly , as well as the use of <term> | ILIMP | </term> in a modular <term> syntactic analysis | #6213 Other tasks using the method developed for ILIMP are described briefly, as well as the use ofILIMP in a modular syntactic analysis system. |
