This paper proposes that
<term>
sentence analysis
</term>
should be treated as
<term>
defeasible reasoning
</term>
, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an
<term>
argumentation system
</term>
by Konolige , which is a formalization of
<term>
defeasible reasoning
</term>
, that includes
<term>
arguments
</term>
and
<term>
defeat rules
</term>
that capture
<term>
defeasibility
</term>
.
#20658This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includes arguments anddefeat rules that capture defeasibility.
other,39-1-C90-3046,ak
This paper proposes that
<term>
sentence analysis
</term>
should be treated as
<term>
defeasible reasoning
</term>
, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an
<term>
argumentation system
</term>
by Konolige , which is a formalization of
<term>
defeasible reasoning
</term>
, that includes
<term>
arguments
</term>
and
<term>
defeat rules
</term>
that capture
<term>
defeasibility
</term>
.
#20656This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includesarguments and defeat rules that capture defeasibility.
other,45-1-C90-3046,ak
This paper proposes that
<term>
sentence analysis
</term>
should be treated as
<term>
defeasible reasoning
</term>
, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an
<term>
argumentation system
</term>
by Konolige , which is a formalization of
<term>
defeasible reasoning
</term>
, that includes
<term>
arguments
</term>
and
<term>
defeat rules
</term>
that capture
<term>
defeasibility
</term>
.
#20662This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includes arguments and defeat rules that capturedefeasibility.
tech,10-1-C90-3046,ak
This paper proposes that
<term>
sentence analysis
</term>
should be treated as
<term>
defeasible reasoning
</term>
, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an
<term>
argumentation system
</term>
by Konolige , which is a formalization of
<term>
defeasible reasoning
</term>
, that includes
<term>
arguments
</term>
and
<term>
defeat rules
</term>
that capture
<term>
defeasibility
</term>
.
#20627This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated asdefeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includes arguments and defeat rules that capture defeasibility.
tech,24-1-C90-3046,ak
This paper proposes that
<term>
sentence analysis
</term>
should be treated as
<term>
defeasible reasoning
</term>
, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an
<term>
argumentation system
</term>
by Konolige , which is a formalization of
<term>
defeasible reasoning
</term>
, that includes
<term>
arguments
</term>
and
<term>
defeat rules
</term>
that capture
<term>
defeasibility
</term>
.
#20641This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using anargumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includes arguments and defeat rules that capture defeasibility.
tech,34-1-C90-3046,ak
This paper proposes that
<term>
sentence analysis
</term>
should be treated as
<term>
defeasible reasoning
</term>
, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an
<term>
argumentation system
</term>
by Konolige , which is a formalization of
<term>
defeasible reasoning
</term>
, that includes
<term>
arguments
</term>
and
<term>
defeat rules
</term>
that capture
<term>
defeasibility
</term>
.
#20651This paper proposes that sentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization ofdefeasible reasoning, that includes arguments and defeat rules that capture defeasibility.
tech,4-1-C90-3046,ak
This paper proposes that
<term>
sentence analysis
</term>
should be treated as
<term>
defeasible reasoning
</term>
, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an
<term>
argumentation system
</term>
by Konolige , which is a formalization of
<term>
defeasible reasoning
</term>
, that includes
<term>
arguments
</term>
and
<term>
defeat rules
</term>
that capture
<term>
defeasibility
</term>
.
#20621This paper proposes thatsentence analysis should be treated as defeasible reasoning, and presents such a treatment for Japanese sentence analyses using an argumentation system by Konolige, which is a formalization of defeasible reasoning, that includes arguments and defeat rules that capture defeasibility.