| other,15-2-C90-3045,bq | characterize correspondences between <term> | languages | </term> . The formalism 's intended usage | #16480 We present a variant of TAGs, called synchronous TAGs, which characterize correspondences betweenlanguages. |
| other,15-3-C90-3045,bq | languages </term> to their associated <term> | semantics | </term> represented in a <term> logical form | #16497 The formalism's intended usage is to relate expressions of natural languages to their associatedsemantics represented in a logical form language, or to their translates in another natural language; in summary, we intend it to allow TAGs to be used beyond their role in syntax proper. |
| other,16-1-C90-3045,bq | a challenge for the application of <term> | TAGs | </term> beyond the limited confines of <term> | #16441 The unique properties of tree-adjoining grammars (TAG) present a challenge for the application ofTAGs beyond the limited confines of syntax, for instance, to the task of semantic interpretation or automatic translation of natural language. |
| other,19-3-C90-3045,bq | <term> semantics </term> represented in a <term> | logical form language | </term> , or to their <term> translates </term> | #16501 The formalism's intended usage is to relate expressions of natural languages to their associated semantics represented in alogical form language, or to their translates in another natural language; in summary, we intend it to allow TAGs to be used beyond their role in syntax proper. |
| other,22-1-C90-3045,bq | </term> beyond the limited confines of <term> | syntax | </term> , for instance , to the task of <term> | #16447 The unique properties of tree-adjoining grammars (TAG) present a challenge for the application of TAGs beyond the limited confines ofsyntax, for instance, to the task of semantic interpretation or automatic translation of natural language. |
| other,26-3-C90-3045,bq | form language </term> , or to their <term> | translates | </term> in another <term> natural language </term> | #16508 The formalism's intended usage is to relate expressions of natural languages to their associated semantics represented in a logical form language, or to theirtranslates in another natural language; in summary, we intend it to allow TAGs to be used beyond their role in syntax proper. |
| other,29-3-C90-3045,bq | their <term> translates </term> in another <term> | natural language | </term> ; in summary , we intend it to allow | #16511 The formalism's intended usage is to relate expressions of natural languages to their associated semantics represented in a logical form language, or to their translates in anothernatural language; in summary, we intend it to allow TAGs to be used beyond their role in syntax proper. |
| other,31-1-C90-3045,bq | </term> , for instance , to the task of <term> | semantic interpretation | </term> or <term> automatic translation of | #16456 The unique properties of tree-adjoining grammars (TAG) present a challenge for the application of TAGs beyond the limited confines of syntax, for instance, to the task ofsemantic interpretation or automatic translation of natural language. |
| other,34-1-C90-3045,bq | <term> semantic interpretation </term> or <term> | automatic translation of natural language | </term> . We present a variant of <term> TAGs | #16459 The unique properties of tree-adjoining grammars (TAG) present a challenge for the application of TAGs beyond the limited confines of syntax, for instance, to the task of semantic interpretation orautomatic translation of natural language. |
| other,4-1-C90-3045,bq | approach </term> . The unique properties of <term> | tree-adjoining grammars ( TAG ) | </term> present a challenge for the application | #16429 The unique properties oftree-adjoining grammars ( TAG ) present a challenge for the application of TAGs beyond the limited confines of syntax, for instance, to the task of semantic interpretation or automatic translation of natural language. |
| other,40-3-C90-3045,bq | in summary , we intend it to allow <term> | TAGs | </term> to be used beyond their role in <term> | #16522 The formalism's intended usage is to relate expressions of natural languages to their associated semantics represented in a logical form language, or to their translates in another natural language; in summary, we intend it to allowTAGs to be used beyond their role in syntax proper. |
| other,48-3-C90-3045,bq | </term> to be used beyond their role in <term> | syntax proper | </term> . We discuss the application of <term> | #16530 The formalism's intended usage is to relate expressions of natural languages to their associated semantics represented in a logical form language, or to their translates in another natural language; in summary, we intend it to allow TAGs to be used beyond their role insyntax proper. |
| other,5-2-C90-3045,bq | language </term> . We present a variant of <term> | TAGs | </term> , called <term> synchronous TAGs </term> | #16470 We present a variant ofTAGs, called synchronous TAGs, which characterize correspondences between languages. |
| other,5-4-C90-3045,bq | </term> . We discuss the application of <term> | synchronous TAGs | </term> to concrete examples , mentioning | #16538 We discuss the application ofsynchronous TAGs to concrete examples, mentioning primarily in passing some computational issues that arise in its interpretation. |
| other,8-2-C90-3045,bq | variant of <term> TAGs </term> , called <term> | synchronous TAGs | </term> , which characterize correspondences | #16473 We present a variant of TAGs, calledsynchronous TAGs, which characterize correspondences between languages. |
| other,8-3-C90-3045,bq | formalism 's intended usage is to relate <term> | expressions of natural languages | </term> to their associated <term> semantics | #16490 The formalism's intended usage is to relateexpressions of natural languages to their associated semantics represented in a logical form language, or to their translates in another natural language; in summary, we intend it to allow TAGs to be used beyond their role in syntax proper. |
