measure(ment),18-7-A94-1007,bq |
system
</term>
, and provided about 75 %
<term>
|
accuracy
|
</term>
in the practical
<term>
translation
|
#19876
This model was practically implemented and incorporated into the English-Japanese MT system, and provided about 75%accuracy in the practical translation use. |
other,0-2-A94-1007,bq |
the equivalent
<term>
words
</term>
.
<term>
|
Syntactic analysis of the English coordinate sentences
|
</term>
is one of the most difficult problems
|
#19699
The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words.Syntactic analysis of the English coordinate sentences is one of the most difficult problems for machine translation (MT) systems. |
other,10-1-A94-1007,bq |
<term>
English sentences
</term>
including
<term>
|
coordinate conjunctions
|
</term>
such as
<term>
and
</term>
,
<term>
or
</term>
|
#19685
The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences includingcoordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words. |
other,12-3-A94-1007,bq |
<term>
candidates
</term>
, the correct
<term>
|
syntactic structure
|
</term>
formed by an individual
<term>
coordinate
|
#19733
The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correctsyntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction. |
other,12-5-A94-1007,bq |
analysis model
</term>
, which provides
<term>
|
top-down scope information
|
</term>
of the correct
<term>
syntactic structure
|
#19796
This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which providestop-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism. |
other,14-1-A94-1007,bq |
coordinate conjunctions
</term>
such as
<term>
|
and
|
</term>
,
<term>
or
</term>
,
<term>
but
</term>
|
#19689
The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences including coordinate conjunctions such asand, or, but and the equivalent words. |
other,14-6-A94-1007,bq |
operation
</term>
for two lists of the
<term>
|
feature sets
|
</term>
, which provides four effects : the
|
#19829
The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of thefeature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. |
other,16-1-A94-1007,bq |
conjunctions
</term>
such as
<term>
and
</term>
,
<term>
|
or
|
</term>
,
<term>
but
</term>
and the equivalent
|
#19691
The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and,or, but and the equivalent words. |
other,18-1-A94-1007,bq |
as
<term>
and
</term>
,
<term>
or
</term>
,
<term>
|
but
|
</term>
and the equivalent
<term>
words
</term>
|
#19693
The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or,but and the equivalent words. |
other,18-3-A94-1007,bq |
structure
</term>
formed by an individual
<term>
|
coordinate conjunction
|
</term>
, i.e. determining which
<term>
constituents
|
#19739
The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individualcoordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction. |
other,18-5-A94-1007,bq |
scope information
</term>
of the correct
<term>
|
syntactic structure
|
</term>
by taking advantage of the
<term>
symmetric
|
#19802
This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correctsyntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism. |
other,21-4-A94-1007,bq |
select the correct one , even if the
<term>
|
grammars
|
</term>
allow to write the
<term>
rules
</term>
|
#19773
Typically, so many possible structures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if thegrammars allow to write the rules in the simple notations. |
other,22-1-A94-1007,bq |
<term>
but
</term>
and the equivalent
<term>
|
words
|
</term>
.
<term>
Syntactic analysis of the
|
#19697
The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalentwords. |
other,22-7-A94-1007,bq |
<term>
accuracy
</term>
in the practical
<term>
|
translation
|
</term>
use . The use of
<term>
NLP techniques
|
#19880
This model was practically implemented and incorporated into the English-Japanese MT system, and provided about 75% accuracy in the practicaltranslation use. |
other,24-3-A94-1007,bq |
conjunction
</term>
, i.e. determining which
<term>
|
constituents
|
</term>
are coordinated by the
<term>
conjunction
|
#19745
The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining whichconstituents are coordinated by the conjunction. |
other,25-5-A94-1007,bq |
structure
</term>
by taking advantage of the
<term>
|
symmetric patterns
|
</term>
of the
<term>
parallelism
</term>
. The
|
#19809
This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of thesymmetric patterns of the parallelism. |
other,25-6-A94-1007,bq |
provides four effects : the reduction of
<term>
|
analysis cost
|
</term>
, the improvement of
<term>
word disambiguation
|
#19840
The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction ofanalysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. |
other,26-4-A94-1007,bq |
<term>
grammars
</term>
allow to write the
<term>
|
rules
|
</term>
in the simple notations . This paper
|
#19778
Typically, so many possible structures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if the grammars allow to write therules in the simple notations. |
other,29-3-A94-1007,bq |
constituents
</term>
are coordinated by the
<term>
|
conjunction
|
</term>
. Typically , so many possible
<term>
|
#19750
The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by theconjunction. |
other,29-5-A94-1007,bq |
<term>
symmetric patterns
</term>
of the
<term>
|
parallelism
|
</term>
. The
<term>
model
</term>
is based on
|
#19813
This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of theparallelism. |