#25658Typically, so many possible structures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if thegrammars allow to write the rules in the simple notations.
measure(ment),18-7-A94-1007,ak
system
</term>
, and provided about 75 %
<term>
accuracy
</term>
in the practical translation use
#25761This model was practically implemented and incorporated into the English-Japanese MT system, and provided about 75%accuracy in the practical translation use.
model,1-6-A94-1007,ak
of the
<term>
parallelism
</term>
. The
<term>
model
</term>
is based on a
<term>
balance matching
#25701Themodel is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis.
model,1-7-A94-1007,ak
<term>
robust analysis
</term>
. This
<term>
model
</term>
was practically implemented and incorporated
#25744Thismodel was practically implemented and incorporated into the English-Japanese MT system, and provided about 75% accuracy in the practical translation use.
model,12-3-A94-1007,ak
<term>
candidates
</term>
, the correct
<term>
syntactic structure
</term>
formed by an individual
<term>
coordinate
#25618The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correctsyntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction.
model,18-5-A94-1007,ak
scope information
</term>
of the correct
<term>
syntactic structure
</term>
by taking advantage of the symmetric
#25687This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correctsyntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism.
model,26-4-A94-1007,ak
<term>
grammars
</term>
allow to write the
<term>
rules
</term>
in the simple notations . This paper
#25663Typically, so many possible structures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if the grammars allow to write therules in the simple notations.
model,4-5-A94-1007,ak
notations . This paper presents an
<term>
English coordinate structure analysis model
</term>
, which provides
<term>
top-down scope
#25673This paper presents anEnglish coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism.
model,5-4-A94-1007,ak
</term>
. Typically , so many possible
<term>
structures
</term>
are produced that
<term>
MT systems
#25642Typically, so many possiblestructures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if the grammars allow to write the rules in the simple notations.
other,10-1-A94-1007,ak
<term>
English sentences
</term>
including
<term>
coordinate conjunctions
</term>
such as and , or , but and the equivalent
#25570The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences includingcoordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words.
other,12-5-A94-1007,ak
analysis model
</term>
, which provides
<term>
top-down scope information
</term>
of the correct
<term>
syntactic structure
#25681This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which providestop-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism.
other,14-6-A94-1007,ak
operation
</term>
for two lists of the
<term>
feature sets
</term>
, which provides four effects : the
#25714The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of thefeature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis.
other,18-3-A94-1007,ak
structure
</term>
formed by an individual
<term>
coordinate conjunction
</term>
, i.e. determining which
<term>
constituents
#25624The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individualcoordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction.
other,22-1-A94-1007,ak
and , or , but and the equivalent
<term>
words
</term>
.
<term>
Syntactic analysis
</term>
of
#25582The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalentwords.
other,24-3-A94-1007,ak
conjunction
</term>
, i.e. determining which
<term>
constituents
</term>
are coordinated by the
<term>
conjunction
#25630The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining whichconstituents are coordinated by the conjunction.
other,25-6-A94-1007,ak
provides four effects : the reduction of
<term>
analysis cost
</term>
, the improvement of
<term>
word disambiguation
#25725The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction ofanalysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis.
other,26-5-A94-1007,ak
taking advantage of the symmetric
<term>
patterns
</term>
of the
<term>
parallelism
</term>
. The
#25695This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetricpatterns of the parallelism.
other,29-3-A94-1007,ak
constituents
</term>
are coordinated by the
<term>
conjunction
</term>
. Typically , so many possible
<term>
#25635The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by theconjunction.
other,29-5-A94-1007,ak
symmetric
<term>
patterns
</term>
of the
<term>
parallelism
</term>
. The
<term>
model
</term>
is based on
#25698This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of theparallelism.
other,35-6-A94-1007,ak
<term>
word disambiguation
</term>
, the
<term>
interpretation
</term>
of
<term>
ellipses
</term>
, and
<term>
#25735The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, theinterpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis.