| lr,21-4-A94-1007,ak | select the correct one , even if the <term> | grammars | </term> allow to write the <term> rules </term> | #25658 Typically, so many possible structures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if thegrammars allow to write the rules in the simple notations. | |
| measure(ment),18-7-A94-1007,ak | system </term> , and provided about 75 % <term> | accuracy | </term> in the practical translation use | #25761 This model was practically implemented and incorporated into the English-Japanese MT system, and provided about 75%accuracy in the practical translation use. | |
| model,1-6-A94-1007,ak | of the <term> parallelism </term> . The <term> | model | </term> is based on a <term> balance matching | #25701 Themodel is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| model,1-7-A94-1007,ak | <term> robust analysis </term> . This <term> | model | </term> was practically implemented and incorporated | #25744 Thismodel was practically implemented and incorporated into the English-Japanese MT system, and provided about 75% accuracy in the practical translation use. | |
| model,12-3-A94-1007,ak | <term> candidates </term> , the correct <term> | syntactic structure | </term> formed by an individual <term> coordinate | #25618 The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correctsyntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction. | |
| model,18-5-A94-1007,ak | scope information </term> of the correct <term> | syntactic structure | </term> by taking advantage of the symmetric | #25687 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correctsyntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism. | |
| model,26-4-A94-1007,ak | <term> grammars </term> allow to write the <term> | rules | </term> in the simple notations . This paper | #25663 Typically, so many possible structures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if the grammars allow to write therules in the simple notations. | |
| model,4-5-A94-1007,ak | notations . This paper presents an <term> | English coordinate structure analysis model | </term> , which provides <term> top-down scope | #25673 This paper presents anEnglish coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism. | |
| model,5-4-A94-1007,ak | </term> . Typically , so many possible <term> | structures | </term> are produced that <term> MT systems | #25642 Typically, so many possiblestructures are produced that MT systems cannot select the correct one, even if the grammars allow to write the rules in the simple notations. | |
| other,10-1-A94-1007,ak | <term> English sentences </term> including <term> | coordinate conjunctions | </term> such as and , or , but and the equivalent | #25570 The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences includingcoordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalent words. | |
| other,12-5-A94-1007,ak | analysis model </term> , which provides <term> | top-down scope information | </term> of the correct <term> syntactic structure | #25681 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which providestop-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of the parallelism. | |
| other,14-6-A94-1007,ak | operation </term> for two lists of the <term> | feature sets | </term> , which provides four effects : the | #25714 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of thefeature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| other,18-3-A94-1007,ak | structure </term> formed by an individual <term> | coordinate conjunction | </term> , i.e. determining which <term> constituents | #25624 The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individualcoordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by the conjunction. | |
| other,22-1-A94-1007,ak | and , or , but and the equivalent <term> | words | </term> . <term> Syntactic analysis </term> of | #25582 The authors propose a model for analyzing English sentences including coordinate conjunctions such as and, or, but and the equivalentwords. | |
| other,24-3-A94-1007,ak | conjunction </term> , i.e. determining which <term> | constituents | </term> are coordinated by the <term> conjunction | #25630 The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining whichconstituents are coordinated by the conjunction. | |
| other,25-6-A94-1007,ak | provides four effects : the reduction of <term> | analysis cost | </term> , the improvement of <term> word disambiguation | #25725 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction ofanalysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, the interpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. | |
| other,26-5-A94-1007,ak | taking advantage of the symmetric <term> | patterns | </term> of the <term> parallelism </term> . The | #25695 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetricpatterns of the parallelism. | |
| other,29-3-A94-1007,ak | constituents </term> are coordinated by the <term> | conjunction | </term> . Typically , so many possible <term> | #25635 The problem is selecting, from all possible candidates, the correct syntactic structure formed by an individual coordinate conjunction, i.e. determining which constituents are coordinated by theconjunction. | |
| other,29-5-A94-1007,ak | symmetric <term> patterns </term> of the <term> | parallelism | </term> . The <term> model </term> is based on | #25698 This paper presents an English coordinate structure analysis model, which provides top-down scope information of the correct syntactic structure by taking advantage of the symmetric patterns of theparallelism. | |
| other,35-6-A94-1007,ak | <term> word disambiguation </term> , the <term> | interpretation | </term> of <term> ellipses </term> , and <term> | #25735 The model is based on a balance matching operation for two lists of the feature sets, which provides four effects: the reduction of analysis cost, the improvement of word disambiguation, theinterpretation of ellipses, and robust analysis. |
