P98-1012 the two main shortcomings of the MUC scoring algorithm discussed earlier .
M98-1010 with SAIC 's version 3.3 of the MUC scoring program . The results are described
M92-1029 testing facilities to augment the MUC scoring apparatus . We have used the
D08-1031 provide results using the official MUC scoring algorithm ( Vilain et al. , 1995
P98-1012 are considered to be equal . The MUC scoring algorithm penalizes the precision
M98-1022 are considered to be equal . The MUC scoring algorithm penalizes the precision
M98-1030 output of human linguists . The MUC scoring software is used in that comparison
P98-2172 but absent from the key ) . The MUC scoring method is n't always meaningful
P98-1012 F-Measure calculated using the MUC scoring algo - rithm . Also , the baseline
P10-2029 evaluated according to the B3 and MUC scoring metrics . 4.2 The Reconcile2010
M92-1044 program in interactive mode . ( See MUC Scoring System User 's Manual , section
P98-1031 first two components correspond to MUC scoring and preserve backward compatibility
P98-1012 tasks . The shortcomings of the MUC scoring algorithm when used for the cross-document
N03-1023 F-measure using the model-theoretic MUC scoring program ( Vilain et al. , 1995
D09-1102 commonly-used model theoretic MUC scoring program ( Vilain et al. , 1995
M98-1030 structure to computer documents . The MUC scoring software recognizes a subset
P03-1023 the F-measure using the standard MUC scoring program ( Vilain et al. 1995
W02-1008 F-measure using the model-theoretic MUC scoring program ( Vilain et al. , 1995
P02-1014 F-measure using the modeltheoretic MUC scoring program ( Vilain et al. , 1995
M98-1030 changed . Output File Formats The MUC scoring software prints several reports
hide detail