C04-1192 Standard ( GS ) against which the WSD algorithm was evaluated . Additionally
C04-1133 feature sets used in the supervised WSD algorithms at best use only minimal information
A00-3007 evaluation in this study , i.e. the WSD algorithm is tested independent of the
A00-3007 can therefore conclude that our WSD algorithm is better than no disambiguation
D14-1065 of the performance of existing WSD algorithms for a multilingual context is
A97-2010 words , previous corpus-based WSD algorithms learn to disambiguate a polysemous
D09-1048 and then running two different WSD algorithms . The accuracy values of approximately
D14-1110 propose two simple and efficient WSD algorithms to obtain more relevant occurrences
D09-1029 Wikipedia page Building . 4 The WSD Algorithm Gliozzo et al. ( 2005 ) proposed
D14-1065 Section 2.1 , BabelNet provides WSD algorithms for multilingual corpora . More
A97-2010 which explains why most previous WSD algorithms only deal with a dozen of polysemous
D14-1042 enhance performance of standard WSD algorithms . A comprehensive overview of
E06-1018 pseudoword-based evaluation method for WSD algorithms . The idea is to take two arbitrarily
E06-3009 defined a priori . Second , classic WSD algorithms take training instances of one
D14-1110 to evaluate our knowledge-based WSD algorithm based on the sense vectors .
E06-1018 are viewed as one set and the WSD algorithm is then supposed to sort them
A00-3007 context ( ties are allowed ) . Our WSD algorithm was also fed with the identical
A00-3007 training methods , we have adopted a WSD algorithm which avoids the necessity for
A00-3007 determine the sense of a word , a WSD algorithm typically uses the context of
A97-2010 polysemous words . We demonstrate a new WSD algorithm that relies on a different intuition
hide detail