J10-4007 We provide results for the best WORDSPACE models from Experiment 1 for
J10-4007 error rate of 25.6 -- 25.7 % . In WORDSPACE , the Lin measure shows the best
J10-4007 bins , although this is not so in WORDSPACE . It seems that in the sparser
J10-4007 lemmatized ) words .3 We refer to it as WORDSPACE . The dependencybased space ,
J10-4007 contrast to Experiment 1 . The best WORDSPACE model ( Lin without PCA ) reaches
J10-4007 frequency bins , the best results in WORDSPACE are better than those in DEPSPACE
J10-4007 schemes . The bottom row shows WORDSPACE without dimensionality reduction
J10-4007 two vector spaces , DEPSPACE and WORDSPACE , shows no clear winner . When
J10-4007 and RESNIK . The DEPSPACE and WORDSPACE variants of EPP perform similarly
J10-4007 are sparser but cleaner , and WORDSPACE shows lower error rates . 6 .
J10-4007 corpus is used to compute either a WORDSPACE or a DEPSPACE vector space ,
J10-4007 the best EPP model when using WORDSPACE in the SYN PRIMARY setting .
J10-4007 both PCA settings . In unreduced WORDSPACE , the divide is not as clearly
J10-4007 easier to distinguish verbs in a WORDSPACE than to distinguish nouns . A
J10-4007 cases ) is not significant ; in WORDSPACE , the difference between the
J10-4007 for all similarity measures , in WORDSPACE as well as DEPSPACE . The improvement
J10-4007 for the McRae data set , the EPP WORDSPACE models show much worse performance
J10-4007 in the less sparse but noisier WORDSPACE , the added noise is stronger
J10-4007 model for inverse preferences ( WORDSPACE , Lin with DISCR weighting )
J10-4007 Jaccard , Dice , and Hindle . For WORDSPACE with PCA-transformation , not
hide detail