J03-4006 |
identified in the passages using the
|
WordNet mapping
|
approach from chapter 4 . In
|
W14-0124 |
2009 ) have used English-Chinese
|
Wordnet mapping
|
to domain tag Chinese Wordnet
|
S13-1004 |
team for sharing OntoNotes to
|
WordNet mappings
|
( Hovy et al. 2006 ) . We thank
|
W14-0106 |
( 1.3.3.1 ) . We consider the
|
Wordnet mapping
|
to be applicable to Semantic
|
W00-1318 |
Acknowledgements <title> Automatic
|
WordNet mapping
|
using word sense disambiguation
|
P07-3015 |
sentences , the frequencies of all
|
WordNet mappings
|
are taken into account without
|
W14-5508 |
next steps Since the Universal
|
WordNet mappings
|
are produced from parallel data
|
W14-5508 |
representation , while the Universal
|
WordNet mappings
|
can be seen as concrete representation
|
S10-1095 |
uses an integrative resource of
|
WordNet mappings
|
. We conducted an experimental
|
N10-1010 |
collocations related to the MFS of w.
|
WordNet mapping
|
takes place and finally HAC with
|
W10-0910 |
article using the category to
|
WordNet mapping
|
( Ponzetto and Navigli , 2009
|
W00-1318 |
To evaluate the performance of
|
WordNet mapping
|
, the candidate synsets of 3260
|
W04-0820 |
fully automated way , by using the
|
WordNet mappings
|
for nouns and ` Istituto per
|
W13-0103 |
, we simply use these TRIPS -
|
WordNet mappings
|
to identify the possible WordNet
|
W10-3301 |
For instance , in the SUMO to
|
Wordnet mapping
|
( Niles and Pease 2003 ) , only
|
W99-0505 |
semrels than currently included in
|
WordNet mappings
|
( 40 7 % ) , a slight improvement
|