C00-2090 |
to offer an unambiguous word to
|
word matching
|
through the " trace " . This
|
C00-2132 |
type of active arc implies that a
|
word matching
|
the . LHS term of tile inactive
|
C94-2173 |
matcher that it requires an exact
|
word matching
|
against a word in the text .
|
D13-1020 |
using lexical techniques , such as
|
word matching
|
, alone . Whilst it is still
|
D14-1017 |
alignment for function to function
|
word matching
|
, namely f2f . The f2f constraint
|
D13-1039 |
class label is discarded . The
|
word matching
|
is performed after word stemming
|
C96-2136 |
This is because , by approximate
|
word matching
|
, tile word-based corrector can
|
A00-1030 |
possible interpretations of a
|
word matching
|
this pattern . These rules are
|
C94-2173 |
-RSB- ows , by defanlt , partial
|
word matching
|
between a key word and a word
|
D10-1110 |
Other generated features include
|
word matching
|
with recurrent event seed words
|
C96-2136 |
consists of an al ) proximate
|
word matching
|
method and an N-best word seg
|
D13-1008 |
lexical variants , we allow fuzzy
|
word matching
|
, that is , we allow lexically
|
D12-1113 |
Rahman and Ng , 2011 ) use exact
|
word matching
|
, relying on YAGO 's ability
|
D14-1017 |
pairs . The content to content
|
word matching
|
function c2c can be defined similarly
|
D14-1017 |
wise , the function to content
|
word matching
|
function f2c is defined by considering
|
C02-1042 |
Pinpointing 3.1 Type 1 : Question
|
Word Matching
|
Unlike ( Prager et al. , 1999
|
C00-2132 |
the inactive arc nmst modi ~ a
|
word matching
|
the head tcrin of the active
|
C00-2132 |
l / - , ~ where 1 . ` I ~ ix a
|
word matching
|
the LHS term A of Arc1 and lYt
|
C00-2132 |
this type of rule implies that a
|
word matching
|
the LHS term of the arc to be
|
C00-2162 |
word matching a main part and a
|
word matching
|
the corresponding prefix part
|