D15-1039 projected dependencies using a voting scheme . For any word ( k , j ) seen
D13-1044 Selection . We apply a naive majority voting scheme to select a single best answer
D13-1044 candidate . A rather naive majority voting scheme already produces satisfactory
C02-1070 system . We considered a simple voting scheme over sets of individual IE sys
D13-1006 heterogeneous data sources in a voting scheme . We show how this framework
C90-3008 strategies are applied using a voting scheme . The candidate with the largest
C04-1112 approach in a multi-classifier voting scheme . Acknowledgments This research
C88-1021 John and Bill ( with the current voting scheme , John is preferred over Bill
D08-1083 is defined as a negator per the voting scheme , then that word does not participate
D14-1139 results by CE , LL , and both voting schemes . The results are shown in the
D13-1044 answers can help in the final voting scheme to come up with a single best
D08-1030 4.2 and describe the Fuzzy Borda Voting Scheme in Section 4.3 . Section 5 describes
D14-1139 accuracy metrics . We call this voting scheme ALIGN . To see the benefit of
D13-1165 single list using a simple ranked voting scheme ( simple Borda count ) . A noteworthy
C88-1021 -RSB- ) , or may be offered a voting scheme where the stronger preferences
D14-1139 address this , we propose a novel voting scheme that is inspired by the widely-used
E03-1038 linearly combining , in a weighted voting scheme , many simple and moderately
D13-1058 the kNN classification and the voting scheme , i.e. , either ( unweighted
D11-1062 Turkers ' agreement , by applying voting schemes , or by adding hidden gold units
D08-1030 that end , we use the Fuzzy Borda Voting Scheme ( FBVS ) . We employ two discriminative
hide detail