P09-2069 |
morphological parser using the
|
twolevel morphology
|
formalism of Koskenniemi ( 1984
|
P98-2171 |
component . In the terminology of
|
twolevel morphology
|
the grammar provides •
|
E93-1043 |
combines the main advantage of
|
twolevel morphology
|
, namely the adequate treatment
|
E95-1028 |
environment for feature-augmented
|
twolevel morphology
|
rules integrated into a full
|
W02-0210 |
for generation . However , the
|
twolevel morphology
|
model ( Koskenniemi , 1983 )
|
P98-2171 |
phonological description in extended
|
twolevel morphology
|
-- in our case rather two-level
|
E99-1040 |
can be seen as an evolution of
|
twolevel morphology
|
( Koskenniemi , 83 ) where the
|
C90-2043 |
processing , ambiguity resulution ,
|
twolevel morphology
|
, conneetionism . 1 Introduction
|
E89-1007 |
be completely separate from the
|
twolevel morphology
|
system ( cf. Ritchie , Pulman
|
W98-0504 |
parser , a generator , support for
|
twolevel morphology
|
and different types of lexica
|
E93-1066 |
1983 -RSB- Kimmo Koskenniemi .
|
Twolevel morphology
|
: A general computational model
|
E93-1043 |
-LSB- Koskenniemi , 1984 -RSB- .
|
Twolevel morphology
|
deals with two aspects of word
|
N13-1140 |
in NLP since the early work on
|
twolevel morphology
|
( Koskenniemi , 1984 ; Kaplan
|
C94-1072 |
linguistic resources consists of a
|
twolevel morphology
|
with feature constraints , all
|
W97-0909 |
5 ) , including the use of the
|
twolevel morphology
|
tool PCKIMMO \ -LSB- 2 , 9 ,
|
C96-1017 |
morphotactics , just like traditional
|
twolevel morphology
|
, it was noted that the interdigitation
|