| C82-1024 | -- somewhere at the end of the | tree formation | process -- leads to an interesting |
| C88-2151 | GPSG , unification is used for | tree formation | . In the version of \ -LSB- GKPS85 |
| C82-1024 | This option is not available in a | tree formation | system which generates " mobiles |
| C82-1024 | syntactic tree . This is not true of | tree formation | rules which leave left-to-right |
| C82-1024 | structures which serve as input to the | tree formation | process . A good strategy for |
| C88-1017 | depends on the strategy adopted for | tree formation | . In order to clarify the For |
| C82-1024 | lexical items which guide the | tree formation | process . In short , syntactic |
| C82-1024 | between stages : roughly , syntactic | tree formation | versus inflectional . morphology |
| W14-4913 | can not be said for syntactic | tree formation | . Besides , the linguists always |
| C82-1024 | contraction can not be performed by the | tree formation | components ( including the word |
| C88-1017 | strategy consists of top-down | tree formation | With this type of proces s , |
| J93-1008 | constructed logical form when | tree formation | is complete . " Thus , all that |
| J94-3007 | exceptional marking . The rules for word | tree formation | then are the following : • |
| C90-2050 | Kempen 's framework for syntactic | tree formation | \ -LSB- Kempen87 \ -RSB- . They |
| C82-1024 | contraction must take place after | tree formation | , that is , after the moment |
| J93-1008 | that purpose is not known until " | tree formation | is complete " ) . The generation |
| C82-1024 | does not make sense to have the | tree formation | components engage in detailed |
| C82-1024 | processor , the application of | tree formation | and word order rules will often |
