J93-4004 |
. Hovy 's structurer employs a
|
top-down planning
|
mechanism to order a given set
|
W90-0112 |
knowledge to do some preliminary
|
top-down planning
|
. For example , a rhetorical
|
W98-1404 |
opportunities We discussed above why
|
top-down planning
|
seems an unnatural basis for
|
P88-1022 |
realizer differs from traditional
|
top-down planning
|
. There are three reasons for
|
P88-1022 |
are three reasons for this . 1 .
|
Top-down planning
|
is prescriptive : it determines
|
W90-0118 |
As Hovy ( 1990 ) points out ,
|
top-down planning
|
is prescriptive , and does not
|
W90-0118 |
treat this refinement task as
|
top-down planning
|
, though our work has not progressed
|
E89-1023 |
the need for both prescriptive ,
|
top-down planning
|
of rhetorical goals , coupled
|
W08-1103 |
as secondary entities . Since a
|
top-down planning
|
approach does not guarantee that
|
P92-1049 |
opportunistic generation of examples and
|
top-down planning
|
of text with examples , and the
|
J97-1004 |
alternative to schemata is the
|
top-down planning
|
approach ( Cawsey 1992 ; 23 A
|
C94-1053 |
communicat.ion knowledge for both
|
top-down planning
|
and bottom-up presentation in
|
J93-4004 |
we do not wish to claim that a
|
top-down planning
|
formalism that maps speakers
|
P88-1022 |
text realiser ? 2 Interleaving or
|
Top-Down Planning
|
? 2.1 The Trouble with Traditional
|
W94-0317 |
cases by assuming A and B. " 2.4
|
Top-Down Planning
|
Top-down presentation operators
|
C94-1053 |
-LSB- I , : i \ -RSB- 9,1 \ -RSB-
|
top-down planning
|
operators contain mostly complex
|
C94-1053 |
) l ) licable operators . 4 .
|
Top-Down Planning
|
` I ` his section elaborM ; es
|