P82-1025 |
away from approximating human
|
speech perception
|
capability . We really have no
|
P79-1005 |
insight into the nature of human
|
speech perception
|
. It is the author 's belief
|
D13-1005 |
model to characteristics of infant
|
speech perception
|
. Infants show an asymmetry between
|
P91-1054 |
prosodic information impacts human
|
speech perception
|
at many different levels -LSB-
|
J88-2010 |
recognition , and auditory modeling of
|
speech perception
|
. Karjalainen 's address is Helsinki
|
H90-1040 |
well known linguistic theories of
|
speech perception
|
. The two most striking features
|
J95-4005 |
importance of formant peaks in
|
speech perception
|
, especially in the case of vowels
|
H93-1064 |
previous experience with synthetic
|
speech perception
|
experiments , we expect these
|
J79-1016 |
Fortunately , much research on
|
speech perception
|
does not require exact duplication
|
E12-1001 |
Abstract Much of what we know about
|
speech perception
|
comes from laboratory studies
|
P79-1005 |
TOWARD A COMPUTATIONAL THEORY OF
|
SPEECH PERCEPTION
|
</title> Jonathan Allen ABSTRACT
|
P79-1005 |
seen that in order to model human
|
speech perception
|
, it is necessary to dynamically
|
P79-1000 |
papers on topics as varied as
|
speech perception
|
, the formal definition of knowledge
|
J88-2015 |
, comparing it to human visual
|
speech perception
|
, and estimating its potential
|
W12-1629 |
idiosyncracy due to human variability in
|
speech perception
|
, gesture recognition , and ,
|
P79-1005 |
the current knowledge of human
|
speech perception
|
, but form the proper basis for
|
W04-1307 |
available , as suggested in neonate
|
speech perception
|
is the case , SL can not , in
|
C73-1013 |
verbal perceptual structures .
|
Speech perception
|
may in a broad sense be defined
|
W10-2201 |
for this position ( e.g. from
|
speech perception
|
and phoneme monitoring experiments
|
P82-1025 |
computational linguists for models of
|
speech perception
|
. Over these twenty years , we
|