W06-1630 a variety of α 's for the score combination method . Note that a higher α
W12-0511 results of majority voting and score combination at the ENTRY tier . As can be
W12-0511 . Therefore we also explore a score combination method that considers these scores
N10-1019 had previously used a hand-tuned score combination instead of a meta-classifier
E91-1004 . And , using the appropriate score combination functions , the scoring of ambiguous
W05-0636 this performs better than the score combination method , it is still no better
N10-2002 sentence scoring techniques and a score combination function . 4 Demonstration 4.1
W06-1630 explore two combination methods : score combination and rank combination . In score
D09-1125 Instead , the globally highest scoring combination of alignment , order , and lexical
W12-0511 4 neither majority voting nor score combination weights this higher performance
E06-1006 limit on the number of moves . The score combination weights are trained by a minimum
W06-1630 combining these two methods , namely score combination and rank combination . These
P98-1023 ter . Finally select the highest scoring combination and eliminate any combinations
H92-1093 the weights used in the linear score combination were chosen to minimize the generalized
C04-1097 in the present work ) , through score combinations from distinct Amalgam pipeline
P13-1129 different classifiers and four score combination methods , and report only the
W12-0511 does not weight votes at all . Score combination is a type of weighted voting
P13-1131 similarity scores , while biasing the score combination according to the given context
W12-0103 results of a selected group of score combinations , where LbTf = LbL , Lf . The
H93-1083 auditory features . * Improved the score combination technique for N - Best rescoring
hide detail