C04-1024 |
for further analyses once the
|
rst analysis
|
of a constituent has been found
|
J96-3006 |
constraints guarantee that a correct
|
RST analysis
|
will form a tree structure .
|
J92-4007 |
primary . This means that in an
|
RST analysis
|
of a discourse , consecutive
|
C04-1048 |
Because of the multiplicity of
|
RST analyses
|
, the discourse parser should
|
J92-4007 |
relations are intentional . However ,
|
RST analyses
|
presume that , for any two consecutive
|
J96-3006 |
this the - ory , consider the
|
RST analysis
|
of the example discourse from
|
J96-3006 |
identify the components of an
|
RST analysis
|
that involve a judgement about
|
H86-1024 |
particular texts arise from an
|
RST analysis
|
of it ? The theory is defined
|
P00-1053 |
this problem . For example , one
|
RST analysis
|
of ( 1 ) proposed by Moser and
|
J92-4007 |
elements is one of the reasons that
|
RST analyses
|
are inherently ambiguous . '
|
P95-1018 |
hypotheses is similar to work using
|
RST analyses
|
to investigate the form of purpose
|
P00-1053 |
Canin in B3 and he in A3 . The
|
RST analysis
|
of this fragment in Figure 5
|
A94-1044 |
of multilingual manuals , the
|
RST analyses
|
for the different language versions
|
P98-2179 |
text may be amenable to multiple
|
RST analyses
|
-- not just as a result of ambiguity
|
J95-1002 |
that must be addressed in any
|
RST analysis
|
is the segmentation of the text
|
J95-1002 |
concerning RST , present an example
|
RST analysis
|
of the Remove-Phone text , and
|
J96-3006 |
we argued that nuclearity in an
|
RST analysis
|
is an implicit claim about Either
|
P98-1044 |
pointed some weak parts and provided
|
RST analysis
|
and to the TELR1 program who
|
J96-3006 |
another . To be an acceptable
|
RST analysis
|
, there must be one schema application
|
J92-4007 |
House Bill 1711 . A plausible
|
RST analysis
|
of ( 1 ) is that there is an
|