N13-1056 |
differences between different
|
rank aggregation
|
methods . Figure 4 plots the
|
N13-1056 |
more sophisticated unsupervised
|
rank aggregation
|
meth - ods . However , we believe
|
W14-4005 |
taken from WMT132 ) . We used the
|
rank aggregation
|
method described in ( Callison-Burch
|
P09-1121 |
to the problem is to leverage
|
rank aggregation
|
formalism ( Dwork et a. , 2001
|
P06-1013 |
combination methods such as unsupervised
|
rank aggregation
|
algorithms ( Tan and Jin , 2004
|
D13-1175 |
be seen from Figures 1 and 3 ,
|
rank aggregation
|
by Borda Count outperforms both
|
P09-2030 |
other is to utilize rank fusion or
|
rank aggregation
|
techniques to combine the ranking
|
D14-1118 |
task difficulty estimation and
|
rank aggregation
|
in crowd - sourcing settings
|
W14-1212 |
for Romance languages after the
|
rank aggregation
|
are as follows : the closest
|
W09-1110 |
use the Borda count method of
|
rank aggregation
|
( Young , 1974 ) to find a consensus
|
W08-0331 |
the " consensus ranking " or "
|
rank aggregation
|
" prob - lem , which can be NP-hard
|
W06-1114 |
problem via total rank distance
|
Rank aggregation
|
is the problem of combining several
|
D15-1011 |
summarization has also been regarded as
|
rank aggregation
|
, where the combined system re-ranks
|
P09-1121 |
well-founded formalism such as
|
rank aggregation
|
approaches ( Dwork et a. , 2001
|
W14-1212 |
in terms of readability is that
|
rank aggregation
|
reports Italian as being closest
|
D15-1243 |
ranking using the Kemeny -- Young
|
rank aggregation
|
algorithm , for each dimension
|
W14-1212 |
multi-criteria technique based on
|
rank aggregation
|
. 3 Experimental Setup 3.1 Data
|
D15-1011 |
perform system combination by
|
rank aggregation
|
. The systems are evaluated on
|
W14-1212 |
and Manea ( 2006 ) show that the
|
rank aggregation
|
problem using rank distance ,
|
W03-2805 |
rankings . Following the average
|
rank aggregation
|
techique ( Ra - jman and Hartley
|