W03-2123 examples the TrindiKit relies on Prolog unification to obtain the correct results
E93-1010 Furthermore , we used ordinary Prolog unification on such terms rather than the
J89-1003 type checking was accomplished by Prolog unification of type trees , representing
J14-1005 bidirectional grammar implemented as a Prolog unification grammar . Two examples are shown
P87-1003 distinctness , is handled through Prolog unification . 18 ) The engine failed . Boundedness
E89-1013 unification instead of the normal Prolog unification . In cu-Prolog , constraints
E89-1013 -LSB- 12 , E which is the usual Prolog unification plus constrain transformation
E95-1028 compiled to a form that allows normal Prolog unification to be used for category matching
J89-1003 these transformations is mainly Prolog unification , but there is an augmentation
N03-3005 unification is carried through internal Prolog unification , we encoded descriptions as
C90-3080 the nonaal ( " destructive " ) PROLOG unification . Furthermore , QPATR provides
P90-1028 presented here depend partly on the Prolog unification mechanism . 221 In order to initiate
E89-1024 repeated variables and for which PROLOG unification provides an immediate test of
J90-1004 would not be caught by the default Prolog unification algorithm . The base case , incorporating
hide detail