W03-2123 |
examples the TrindiKit relies on
|
Prolog unification
|
to obtain the correct results
|
E93-1010 |
Furthermore , we used ordinary
|
Prolog unification
|
on such terms rather than the
|
J89-1003 |
type checking was accomplished by
|
Prolog unification
|
of type trees , representing
|
J14-1005 |
bidirectional grammar implemented as a
|
Prolog unification
|
grammar . Two examples are shown
|
P87-1003 |
distinctness , is handled through
|
Prolog unification
|
. 18 ) The engine failed . Boundedness
|
E89-1013 |
unification instead of the normal
|
Prolog unification
|
. In cu-Prolog , constraints
|
E89-1013 |
-LSB- 12 , E which is the usual
|
Prolog unification
|
plus constrain transformation
|
E95-1028 |
compiled to a form that allows normal
|
Prolog unification
|
to be used for category matching
|
J89-1003 |
these transformations is mainly
|
Prolog unification
|
, but there is an augmentation
|
N03-3005 |
unification is carried through internal
|
Prolog unification
|
, we encoded descriptions as
|
C90-3080 |
the nonaal ( " destructive " )
|
PROLOG unification
|
. Furthermore , QPATR provides
|
P90-1028 |
presented here depend partly on the
|
Prolog unification
|
mechanism . 221 In order to initiate
|
E89-1024 |
repeated variables and for which
|
PROLOG unification
|
provides an immediate test of
|
J90-1004 |
would not be caught by the default
|
Prolog unification
|
algorithm . The base case , incorporating
|