W09-1307 based on the second category of ontology evaluation methods . OntoSelect is an ontology
W04-1110 added into the ontology . For ontology evaluation , experiments on web search were
C04-1164 integrated into the ontology . For ontology evaluation , experiments were conducted
W03-0903 There is no agreed methodology for ontology evaluation . In our opinion , the usefulness
W04-1806 evaluation , lack standard criteria for ontology evaluation . Although ontology evaluation
E14-4007 illustrating its usefulness as an ontology evaluation tool . Fi - nally , section 5
J06-4009 learning and the related issue of ontology evaluation . It will be of interest not
J06-4009 authors make a major contribution to ontology evaluation in this paper . In contrast with
W04-1806 ontology evaluation . Although ontology evaluation remains challenging , we have
W15-0404 ontology design and especially via ontology evaluation methodologies . One of the most
W09-1307 uses and extends some of existing ontology evaluation and validation methods regarding
W06-3505 necessary . For the baseline of ontology evaluation a task-based framework as proposed
J04-2002 recently being made on the side of ontology evaluation tools and methods , but available
J13-3007 the noisy graph . 4 . Evaluation Ontology evaluation is a hard task that is difficult
C04-1150 Bianche 12 </figurecaption> Abstract Ontology evaluation is a critical task , even more
W09-1307 authors indicate the challenges for ontology evaluation posed by ontology selection for
W01-1005 are not aware of any assessed Ontology evaluation methodology in the literature
N12-2007 disambiguation ( Ni et al. , 2010 ) , ontology evaluation ( Yu et al. , 2007 ) , semantic
W06-0506 used ( Cimiano et al. , 2005 ) 's ontology evaluation method in which lexical recall
hide detail