W09-3306 |
features from the Eisner ( 1996 )
|
normal form derivation
|
. This is the model C&C recommend
|
S15-1032 |
semantic representation from the
|
normal form derivation
|
. A normal form derivation is
|
E89-1002 |
form derivations . Computing only
|
normal form derivations
|
is safe provided every non-normal
|
W06-1637 |
separate models for incremental and
|
normal form derivations
|
. Models were fitted to a balanced
|
W06-1637 |
semantic inter - pretation . Such
|
normal form derivations
|
only use composition and type-raising
|
W06-1637 |
obtain a single right-branching
|
normal form derivation
|
( Eisner , 1996 ) for each possible
|
W06-1637 |
tree . We then transform this
|
normal form derivation
|
into the most incremental ( i.e.
|
E89-1002 |
assuming exhaustive search : the
|
normal form derivation
|
to which it is equivalent , and
|
E89-1002 |
limit attention in parsing to
|
normal form derivations
|
: for all the derivations excluded
|
E89-1002 |
it is thus the only admissible
|
normal form derivation
|
. The derivations are related
|
E89-1002 |
derivations to theh normal forms ,
|
normal form derivations
|
being those to which no contraction
|
E89-1002 |
in which there ie a notion of
|
normal form derivation
|
, and a set ol contraction rules
|
S15-1032 |
the normal form derivation . A
|
normal form derivation
|
is defined as the one which uses
|
J07-3004 |
our translation algorithm yields
|
normal form derivations
|
( Hepple and Morrill 1989 ; Wittenburg
|
D09-1123 |
) ( 3 ) by transforming every
|
normal form derivation
|
into strictly left-to-right CCG
|
J00-3002 |
the Cut-free atomic-id space ,
|
normal form derivations
|
in which the succession of rule
|
S15-1032 |
) ) and x2 , ... , xn are the
|
normal form derivation
|
. fresh variables . 4.2.2 Semantic
|