| P98-2133 | performance evaluations on the | native-code compiler | are also presented . 5.1 Design |
| P98-2133 | because the implementation of the | native-code compiler | is not completed . How - ever |
| P98-2133 | implementation of built-in functions on the | native-code compiler | . 5.3 Performance Evaluation |
| P98-2133 | We are currently developing a | native-code compiler | of LiLFeS in order to attain |
| P98-2133 | to Table 3 ) approaches to the | native-code compiler | versions of commercial Prolog |
| P98-2133 | Compiler We are developing the LiLFeS | native-code compiler | in LiLFeS itself . This is because |
| P98-2133 | design policies for the LiLFeS | native-code compiler | are : • Native code output |
| P98-2133 | SICStus ( breadth-first ) and LiLFeS | native-code compiler | ( depth-first ) 5 . What is notable |
| P98-2133 | Van Roy , 1990 ) , an optimizing | native-code compiler | for Prolog . Aquarius Prolog |
| P98-2133 | the performance of the LiLFeS | native-code compiler | with the same experiments as |
| P98-2133 | TFSs . We are now developing a | native-code compiler | version of LiLFeS ; the prototype |
| P98-2133 | still slower than ProFIT + SICStus | native-code compiler | in some experiments , though |
| P98-2133 | and Table 6 . The results of the | native-code compiler | are significantly better than |
| P07-2053 | . OCaml has a highperformance | native-code compiler | ( Doligez et al. , 2004 ) that |
| P98-2133 | this optimized LiLFeS . 5 LiLFeS | Native-Code Compiler | We are currently developing a |
| P98-2133 | , while the second one uses a | native-code compiler | and therefore is much more efficient |
| P98-2133 | Performance Evaluation of the LiL - FeS | Native-Code Compiler | We evaluated the performance |
