N07-1007 |
significantly outperformed standard
|
n-best re-ranking
|
. This method should be generally
|
N07-1007 |
also proposed an extension of
|
n-best re-ranking
|
which significantly outperformed
|
N07-1007 |
straightforward application of the
|
n-best re-ranking
|
approach described in Och et
|
P09-1066 |
hypothesis re-ranking , and f for
|
n-best re-ranking
|
only . For partial hypothesis
|
D14-1094 |
Viterbi search approach outperforms
|
N-best re-ranking
|
approach . The optimal value
|
D14-1094 |
reaches higher values compared to
|
N-best re-ranking
|
approach . Notice that , when
|
D08-1076 |
used to boost the BLEU score on
|
N-best re-ranking
|
tasks . The incorporation of
|
D13-1107 |
2010 ) proposed using MTL for
|
N-best re-ranking
|
on sparse feature sets , where
|
D14-1094 |
surpasses 3 . This is because , unlike
|
N-best re-ranking
|
approach , modified Viterbi search
|
D14-1094 |
implementing Equation 1 . 1 .
|
N-best re-ranking
|
: N-best sequences of spacing
|
P08-2010 |
quickly boost the BLEU score on
|
N-best re-ranking
|
tasks . In this paper , we describe
|
W06-1626 |
. This limits the potential of
|
N-best re-ranking
|
. Spurious ambiguity is created
|
N07-1007 |
turn . 4.1 Method 1 : Standard
|
n-best re-ranking
|
This method is a straightforward
|
N07-1007 |
experimentation . Within the space of
|
n-best re-ranking
|
, we have considered two variations
|
N07-1007 |
information as features in a standard
|
n-best re-ranking
|
scenario does not lead to an
|
N07-1007 |
substantially outperforms standard
|
n-best re-ranking
|
. Our best performing model achieves
|
P12-1032 |
that in graph construction for
|
n-best re-ranking
|
, except that two nodes are always
|
P08-2010 |
Minimum Error Rate Training for
|
N-best Re-ranking
|
</title> Katrin Kirchhoff Abstract
|
D13-1013 |
using minimal expected F - loss in
|
n-best re-ranking
|
. Georgila ( 2009 ) uses integer
|
N13-1048 |
' ) . The hinge loss under the
|
N-best re-ranking
|
framework is defined as max (
|