J90-1003 |
research , especially in the area of
|
lexical retrieval
|
. Generally speaking , subjects
|
P83-1014 |
it to Tom ? In practice , the
|
lexical retrieval
|
problem is complicated by errors
|
P83-1014 |
how parsing can play a role in
|
lexical retrieval
|
. Consider the phonetic transcription
|
P89-1010 |
research , especially in the area of
|
lexical retrieval
|
. Generally speaking , subjects
|
W15-0914 |
overall demands will interfere with
|
lexical retrieval
|
, creating a cognitive bottleneck
|
W15-0914 |
demands diminish the capacity of
|
lexical retrieval
|
, and cause MWE production to
|
J92-1001 |
to a domain . As a result , the
|
lexical retrieval
|
mechanism never forces the system
|
J80-1001 |
evidence that the word is there . The
|
lexical retrieval
|
component of HWIM can thus be
|
P83-1014 |
techniques . 1.1 An Example of
|
Lexical Retrieval
|
It might be helpful to work out
|
P91-1048 |
shown to play an important role in
|
lexical retrieval
|
, and were suggested as relevant
|
J80-1001 |
( Woods et al. , 1976 ) . The
|
lexical retrieval
|
component made use of a network
|
J92-1001 |
4.1 Morphological Analysis and
|
Lexical Retrieval
|
The first step in processing
|
M98-1008 |
left open for a more e # 0Bective
|
lexical retrieval
|
mechanism . The Plink Parser
|
P83-1014 |
so doing , I have replaced the
|
lexical retrieval
|
problem with two ( hopefully
|
P09-2015 |
steps . The first step , Expanded
|
Lexical Retrieval
|
( ELR ) , uses shallow semantic
|
H89-2012 |
and word association norms on
|
lexical retrieval
|
without careful controls for
|
A97-1031 |
used for performing concept-based
|
lexical retrieval
|
( e.g. , for extracting word
|
P83-1014 |
In summary . I believe that the
|
lexical retrieval
|
device will be in a superior
|
J80-1001 |
observing the interaction between the
|
lexical retrieval
|
component and the " pragmatic
|
W12-4904 |
contributed to the investigation of the
|
lexical retrieval
|
of words and the processing of
|