P04-1003 Hodgson 's ( 1991 ) single-word lexical priming study . We tested the hypothesis
H05-1104 introduces such a diagnostic for lexical priming : adaptation probabilities .
P07-1102 alignment . We choose syntactic over lexical priming for two reasons . Lexical repetition
J07-2002 Hodgson 's ( 1991 ) single-word lexical priming study . In single-word semantic
D14-1155 a flow exhibits some amount of lexical priming with the first . The high accuracy
D11-1028 that the model primarily captures lexical priming , rather than co-reference .
P04-1003 the middle ground between the lexical priming and contextual constraint paradigms
W12-1612 phenomenon considered centers on lexical priming , the tendency for one interlocutor
H05-1104 psycholinguistic literature . similarity to lexical priming , showing positive adaptation
P04-3011 distinguished two priming effects , namely lexical priming and relation priming . She claimed
P04-3011 head noun was repeated , only lexical priming was observed but that when the
J10-4007 ( McDonald and Brew 2004 ) and lexical priming ( Lowe and McDonald 2000 ) .
W06-1637 topic-dependent or instances of lexical priming , we only collect syntactic repetitions
W09-3711 model conceptual phenomena like lexical priming -LSB- 13 -RSB- , it is reasonable
P04-1003 to a more stringent test : the lexical priming situation where more than one
H05-1104 - p ; - t ( 3 ) In the case of lexical priming , Church observes that P + Pprior
P04-3011 diminishes the effectiveness of lexical priming . Such an interference could
P04-1003 demonstrated that single-word lexical priming can be modeled as the influence
D10-1003 measure originates in work on lexical priming ( Church , 2000 ) , and quantifies
H05-1104 been improved using models of lexical priming . 3 Experiment 1 : Parallelism
hide detail