| A00-1042 | 1998 -RSB- proposed the method of | Head Sorting | for identifying significant topics |
| N03-1035 | ( 7980 ) was identified by the | head sorting | method . This is because it applies |
| N03-1035 | index terms were identified by | head sorting | , only 51 % of the terms subjects |
| N03-1035 | many of the terms identified by | Head Sorting | suggested that the technical |
| N03-1035 | Termer that were not identified by | Head Sorting | . Table 2 shows the number of |
| N03-1035 | subset of terms identified by | Head Sorting | . Differences in the implementations |
| A00-1042 | quality and coverage metric , the | Head Sorting | ( HS ) method , described in |
| N03-1035 | Justeson and Katz ( 1995 ) and the | head sorting | method ( Dagan and Church ( 1994 |
| A00-1042 | Conclusion Our results show that the | head sorting | technique outperforms two other |
| W98-0610 | method , discussed below , the | head sorting | method of determining topic significance |
| N03-1035 | threshold in a corpus ; in the | head sorting | method , technical terms are |
| N03-1035 | fewer than the terms identified by | head sorting | , were overall of higher quality |
| N03-1035 | than the terms identified by the | head sorting | method . However , the fact that |
