| W96-0114 | Figure 2 depicts an example of the | grouping process | . G3 ( ADJ ) ( NOUN ) CT l gi |
| W05-1204 | use any special process for the | grouping process | . Conse - quently , our results |
| W02-0904 | classes . Constraints are put on the | grouping process | in order to keep the classes |
| W96-0114 | context-free grammar . In the | grouping process | , a single nonterminal label |
| W96-0114 | each bracket in the corpus . In a | grouping process | , a single nonterminal label |
| P99-1047 | very seldom in the corpus . The | grouping process | yielded 17 clusters , each characterized |
| W13-4704 | related word forms . Given that the | grouping process | was done by subjective human |
| W14-0801 | several other conjugations . The | grouping process | merges these to a single en - |
| M92-1027 | inputs and outputs to the topic | grouping process | . Note that moderately high evidenc |
| M91-1024 | inputs and outputs to the topic | grouping process | . Note that moderately high evidence |
| C02-1041 | call this process the semantic | grouping process | . One straightforward way to |
| W96-0114 | we can observe that the label | grouping process | is a hard problem that may make |
| M91-1027 | are merged or segmented by th e | grouping process | . Groups of sentences associated |
| W07-1508 | Figure 1 ) . During our sense | grouping process | , linguists ( henceforth , " |
| W13-4704 | together which means that the manual | grouping process | has an inherent UI . As a result |
| P96-1003 | ) would undergo the following | grouping process | : general purpose high performance |
