P13-3019 trees were obtained using the WCDG German parser . The reason why we chose this
E09-1033 and 1-best German parses . The German parser was trained on the TIGER treebank
W14-3324 which is similar to that of the German parsers . For the systems that translate
P12-1102 would raise the performance of German parsers . Here again , the problem setting
W04-1905 standard for the evaluation of German parsers . 1 Introduction The TiGer Dependency
W08-0302 English parser compared to the German parser . 6.4 Feature Selection Translation
P05-1066 thank Amit Dubey for providing the German parser used in our experiments . Thanks
W04-1905 dependency-based gold standard for German parsers The TiGer Dependency Bank </title>
D15-1039 when the output of a supervised German parser is used as gold standard data
W07-0723 Niessen and Ney , 2004 ) . The German parser also splits contracted prepositions
W04-1905 ambiguity . For a gold standard for German parsers , we consider it reasonable to
W04-1905 given to these phenomena by all German parsers we are aware of differs from
E09-1033 English parser is in-domain and the German parser is out-of-domain , both of which
W06-1903 with SMES -LSB- NP02 -RSB- , our German parser . The resulting query object
D15-1039 dependencies from a supervised German parser on the same data . That is ,
N10-1113 subject-object ambiguity in German . German parsers have no access to the contextual
W04-1905 be used for the evaluation of German parsers , both for regression tests during
W04-1905 NP eine Entschadigung . Current German parsers , however , would attach this
W04-1905 which are generally not made by German parsers , so that some rather special
W08-1705 dependency-based gold standard for German parsers that encodes grammatical relations
hide detail