J13-1005 |
simplified in the last centuries than
|
German morphology
|
. This nicely confirms the correlation
|
C92-4195 |
the following basic features of
|
German morphology
|
: * Composition . * Derivation
|
W11-1403 |
orthography . Information about
|
German morphology
|
is retrieved from a lexicon listing
|
C86-1091 |
derivational ending . There is a rule in
|
German morphology
|
stating that in compound words
|
D14-1130 |
due to reordering and complex
|
German morphology
|
. We chose three text genres
|
C90-2064 |
morphology to non-concatenative
|
German morphology
|
. Abstract Introduction In this
|
C90-2064 |
morphosyntactic phenomena . While
|
German morphology
|
is mainly based on concatenation
|
W08-0905 |
annotated corpus to teach Irish and
|
German morphology
|
. Reviewing the Czech electronic
|
W10-1727 |
This is not surprising , since
|
German morphology
|
is more complex than English
|
C90-2064 |
umlautung is a regular phenomenon of
|
German morphology
|
, the treatment of which should
|
W11-4115 |
primarily based on the output of the
|
German morphology
|
system Gertwol by Lingsoft ,
|
P05-1039 |
more complete information about
|
German morphology
|
, our suffix analysis model allows
|
J89-2008 |
Most attention was devoted to
|
German morphology
|
and syntax , since French generation
|
J13-1005 |
finite state formalization of
|
German morphology
|
and ( ii ) a large lexicon of
|
S14-1009 |
explained by the high complexity of
|
German morphology
|
as compared to the morphology
|
P12-2027 |
and two routines to deal with
|
German morphology
|
( affixa - tion and compounding
|
J13-1005 |
effect of the integration of a
|
German morphology
|
on parsing accuracy ( see Section
|
W14-1006 |
extension of our dictionary . 4
|
German morphology
|
features Apart from extending
|
P98-2123 |
Morphy , an integrated tool for
|
German morphology
|
, part-ofspeech tagging and context-sensitive
|
P03-1025 |
the case for suffixation , since
|
German morphology
|
is exclusively right-headed .6
|