| N01-1021 | word to word . On such a theory , | garden-pathing | can not be explained by re - |
| W12-4904 | of regressions in response to | garden-pathing | has shed new light on the mechanisms |
| N01-1021 | parallelism theory . The explanation for | garden-pathing | will turn on the reduction in |
| P84-1103 | required in order to account for | garden-pathing | . ) In addition , in strong parallelism |
| W12-4904 | theories about eye guidance during | garden-pathing | . We also show how relatively |
| P84-1103 | much weaker than for classical | garden-pathing | items like ( 1 ) . It seems more |
| P11-1106 | surprisal thus predicts strong | garden-pathing | effects in the classic sentence |
| W12-4904 | lexical ambiguity which can lead to | garden-pathing | ( " Ton " can mean sound or clay |
| P84-1103 | is no conscious experience of | garden-pathing | , and that the error and RT effects |
| P84-1103 | preceded by ( 5b ) results in | garden-pathing | at the point of disambiguation |
| P11-1106 | We now move on to cases where | garden-pathing | can apparently be blocked by |
| P82-1036 | apparently to prevent hearers from " | garden-pathing | " on this construction , but |
| N01-1021 | selection of a grammar formalism . 6 | Garden-pathing | 6.1 A celebrated example Probabilistic |
| P11-1106 | the barn fell ) of 6.4 bits .1 3 | Garden-pathing | and input uncertainty We now |
