W02-0906 |
several systems on subcategorization
|
frame acquisition
|
. C. Manning ( 1993 ) presents
|
P09-1004 |
of automatic subcategorization
|
frame acquisition
|
. Notable examples include (
|
C96-2163 |
In the framework of verbal case
|
frame acquisition
|
fi'om parallel corpora , bilingually
|
C96-2163 |
Japanese verbal polysemy in case
|
frame acquisition
|
from Japanese-English parallel
|
N09-1059 |
effect of corpus size on case
|
frame acquisition
|
for discourse analysis in Japanese
|
C04-1159 |
automatic text summarization or case
|
frame acquisition
|
. Because it is difficult to
|
N09-1059 |
effectiveness of a larger corpus in case
|
frame acquisition
|
for Japanese discourse analysis
|
W02-0906 |
of noise in subcategorization
|
frame acquisition
|
. Introduction In recent years
|
J05-3003 |
of automatic subcategorization
|
frame acquisition
|
. For this reason , following
|
C96-2163 |
Japanese verbal polysemy in case
|
frame acquisition
|
from Japanese-English parallel
|
P13-3004 |
they used the subcategorization
|
frame acquisition
|
system by Preiss et al. ( 2007
|
J06-3002 |
large-scale subcategorization
|
frame acquisition
|
. The main idea underlying the
|
C96-2159 |
our new algorithm to verbal case
|
frame acquisition
|
and show its effec - tiveness
|
W04-0809 |
described the subcategorization
|
frame acquisition
|
as a method for evaluating WSD
|
N09-1059 |
effect of corpus size on case
|
frame acquisition
|
for syntactic and case structure
|
P04-1047 |
to automating subcategorisation
|
frame acquisition
|
for LFG ( Kaplan and Bresnan
|
W00-1325 |
Filtering and Subcategorization
|
Frame Acquisition
|
</title> Anna Korhonen Genevieve
|
N04-4014 |
and we are working on effective
|
frame acquisition
|
methods , which is outside of
|
C94-2116 |
unambiguous way . ( 3 ) Manual case
|
frame acquisition
|
tends to yield inconsis tent
|
C04-1189 |
and we are working on effective
|
frame acquisition
|
methods , which is outside of
|