W14-4922 provide syntactic cues restricting focus marking . For example , an Entity will
C90-1016 generalization on the organization of the focus marking factors . We simply assume the
C04-1034 constructions in which explicit focus marking occurs . Examples from the list
C96-2113 a speech component . However , focus marking by prosody is often ambiguous
P06-2044 interactions between sentence markers and focus marking in Somali . So - mali , as a
C94-2160 multiple pronunciations . Topic and focus marking will also be introduced at some
P06-2044 tractable grammar for Somali in which focus marking emerges naturally from a consideration
W97-1206 tree nodes have been assigned focus markings , their weak/strong labelling
C96-2113 based on context information . 2 Focus marking The basic data are well-known
C80-1034 definite marking , topic & focus marking , scenario-searching , &
J00-4002 ambiguous between all possible focus markings would be computationally disastrous
J00-4002 treat a sentence with no apparent focus marking as ambiguous between all possible
W00-1416 ( 3b ) . Rooth formalizes the focus marking in these examples as contributing
W97-1201 presented here by simply representing focus markings as labeled features in the binary
E83-1005 but it is still different from focus marking in the corresponding English
W02-2120 every utterance , this prosodic focus marking is often ambiguous . A single
C96-2113 A 's question leads to expect focus marking of the complete VP , but intonational
C04-1034 anaphors . In cases of explicit focus marking the shift of focus of attention
W04-0713 constructions in which explicit focus marking occurs and the focal DEs have
W12-3808 ( 1a ) ) : the PB-FOC rate of focus marking in our subcorpus is 74 % ( somewhat
hide detail