W98-1126 Wiebe et al. 1997a to perform the event categorization task described in section 2 .
W15-0913 event participants in influencing event categorization . Consider the two uses of sell
W09-1411 misses one argument 5 . FPs : wrong event categorization ( mostly gene expression vs.
W98-1126 . In experiments performing an event categorization task , Wiebe et al. ( 1997a )
W98-1126 on the project web site . The event categorization task is a challenging test for
W15-0913 complexity to be relevant for event categorization . 3.2 Time scale The parameter
W15-0913 automate this finergrained level of event categorization to some de - gree . With respect
W15-0913 as an assumption for automating event categorization in Experiment 2 . 5 Experiment
W98-1126 the best overall results on our event categorization task , as shown later in table
W98-1126 collocations are also important for many event categorization and discourse processing tasks
W98-1126 discourse segmentation tasks . This event categorization task is very chal - lenging .
W98-1126 aspects of their meaning ) . For event categorization , we could sift through the main
W15-0913 limitations of lexical approaches to event categorization and outlines an alternative approach
W15-0913 explore methods of automating event categorization to approximate our Gold Standard
W15-0913 experience that are available for event categorization . Examples are drawn from our
W15-0913 inferences may be relevant to event categorization . Consider the examples in (
W98-1126 their interaction are rare . 2 The Event Categorization Task This work is part of a larger
W15-0913 expressions as in ( 1 ) . Confining event categorization to the verb may additionally
W15-0913 as MWEs Lexical approaches to event categorization , i.e. those that only rely upon
W15-0913 the clause may play a role in event categorization . The methods we employ are easily
hide detail