| C94-2182 | falls out of the regular plan | evaluation process | . If the final constraint does |
| C04-1083 | external person ( not involved in the | evaluation process | ) . The second set is composed |
| C96-2189 | computer using HyperCard . The | evaluation process | is made up of the following steps |
| C82-1044 | CPS or a functional value . The | evaluation process | is defined by a ( pure ) LISP |
| D11-1042 | the overall reliability of the | evaluation process | . In addition , the greater the |
| D13-1002 | , and the need to simplify the | evaluation process | ( Verhagen et al. , 2009 ) . |
| D13-1067 | and user context in the sentence | evaluation process | . Meng et al. , ( 2012 ) proposed |
| C96-2188 | represent a major step during the | evaluation process | of machine translation applications |
| C92-2067 | with the above proposals , the | evaluation process | can be done quickly and automatically |
| D10-1018 | Performance in Translation The | evaluation process | as described in Section 6.2 requires |
| C82-1044 | and composition function . The | evaluation process | of a CPS formula is defined as |
| C04-1138 | a useful threshold during the | evaluation process | . 5.1 Evaluation of historical |
| C86-1123 | where do the criteria of this | evaluation process | come from ? One possibility is |
| C86-1061 | the beginning of the importance | evaluation process | . Dynamic updating of weights |
| A00-1014 | companion paper describes the | evaluation process | and results in further detail |
| D09-1029 | plan to carry out an extended | evaluation process | in order to compute inter-annotator |
| C92-1023 | algorithm , we can describe the | evaluation process | in more detail as follows : 3.1 |
| C02-1083 | terms within titles ) . In the | evaluation process | , we used 5 different samples |
| C04-1182 | needed in the classification / | evaluation process | to determine where reading miscues |
| C92-2067 | performance measure and a performance | evaluation process | with the following properties |
