A00-2039 |
FSA representing a morpheme by
|
encoding
|
stepwise repetition locally .
|
A00-1016 |
made based on the meta - output
|
encoding
|
the estimated cost of executing
|
A00-1029 |
non-terminals . Note that such an
|
encoding
|
can potentially create a very
|
A00-3006 |
the specification of the Text
|
Encoding
|
Initiative . <title> Word Sense
|
A00-2006 |
adjectives taxonomy ) . However , by
|
encoding
|
a hyponymy relation for these
|
A00-2006 |
reconsidered the possibility of
|
encoding
|
hyponymy for adjectives . By
|
A00-2006 |
lexical-semantic relations , aiming at
|
encoding
|
data which can be useful for
|
A00-2036 |
pairing strings in L ( M ) with
|
encodings
|
of their accepting computations
|
A00-2023 |
to the generation process after
|
encoding
|
many alternative phrasings into
|
A00-2036 |
( a2 , q2 ) ( a3 , g3 ) be the
|
encoding
|
of an accepting computation in
|
A00-2034 |
compared to the cost of a TCM for
|
encoding
|
the union of the argument head
|
A00-1029 |
the attribute values from the
|
encoding
|
in the non-terminal names . For
|
A00-3006 |
the evaluation of emerging text
|
encoding
|
standards , such as the specification
|
A00-1029 |
in such a way as to leave the
|
encoding
|
of the attribute values in the
|
A00-1004 |
the most probable language and
|
encoding
|
of a text ( Isabelle et al. ,
|
A00-2006 |
Johns Hopkins University . <title>
|
Encoding
|
information on adjectives in
|
A00-2006 |
EAGLES recommendations on semantic
|
encoding
|
( cf. Sanfilippo et al. 1999
|
A00-2042 |
is in the $ R relation . This
|
encoding
|
leads to models like ( 12b )
|
A00-2006 |
seen , in WN the possibility of
|
encoding
|
hyponymy for adjectives is denied
|
A00-2039 |
For truncation , a similar local
|
encoding
|
is avail - able : For every content
|