P12-1011 |
features have not been used in a
|
document dating
|
setting . We use the freely available
|
P12-1011 |
the corpus2 . A training set for
|
document dating
|
must not include duplicates from
|
P12-1011 |
consideration . Previous work on
|
document dating
|
does not integrate this information
|
D13-1001 |
between events and documents for the
|
document dating
|
task . Different with the conventional
|
D13-1001 |
models and different automatic
|
document dating
|
models on the Gigaword dataset
|
P12-1011 |
future comparison and progress on
|
document dating
|
. Acknowledgments Many thanks
|
P12-1011 |
and a new set of features for
|
document dating
|
( 14 % improvement ) . Such a
|
D13-1001 |
research focusing on the task of
|
document dating
|
. Kanhabua and Norvag ( 2009
|
P12-1011 |
language not yet addressed for
|
document dating
|
: linguistic structure and absolute
|
P12-1011 |
evaluation . Most previous work on
|
document dating
|
evaluates on the news genre ,
|
P12-1011 |
Named entities are important to
|
document dating
|
due to the nature of people and
|
P12-1011 |
class is most likely . However ,
|
document dating
|
is not just a simple topic classification
|
W06-0903 |
that can be used for automatic
|
document dating
|
. Past and ongoing related research
|
W13-2714 |
classification when dealing with
|
documents dating
|
from different epochs , identifying
|
N06-2008 |
Classification of Text and Automatic
|
Document Dating
|
</title> Angelo Dalli Abstract
|
P06-1073 |
chronological order ) 15 % of
|
documents dating
|
from " 20021015 0101 " ( i.e.
|
N09-2007 |
parallel corpus by downloading
|
documents dating
|
from January 1998 through April
|
W05-0709 |
three sources : 38 Arabic treebank
|
documents dating
|
from " 20000715 " ( i.e. , July
|