E97-1051 practice this is not a problem . In discourse interpretation , all we usually know about an
C92-2108 extend the KB so as to include the discourse interpretation . Consider now the process of
C96-2116 text understanding systems , and discourse interpretation systems . 2 The Reconstruction
E06-1049 investigated it and formulated a Temporal Discourse Interpretation Principle to interpret the advance
D14-1136 empty SM otherwise . We define a discourse interpretation function sem ( d ) that returns
J03-4002 incorporated into a general approach to discourse interpretation . There are three possible ways
H89-1049 we claim that at the level of discourse interpretation , the request and response form
C92-2108 reasoning . Consider the process of discourse interpretation as one of KB extension . The
E03-2014 Prolog components for parsing and discourse interpretation ( Saggion et al. , In press )
H89-1049 sophisticated approach , including a discourse interpretation module and a segment-based approach
J03-4002 distinctions are important to discourse interpretation , but they are independent of
J00-2002 in the course of the multimodal discourse interpretation , and the graphical ambiguity
D14-1136 assume that sem ( d ) is a simple discourse interpretation function , where entities , methods
A97-1035 semantic interpretation , and discourse interpretation . 5.2 The CREOLEisation of LaSIE
D14-1136 endowed with a more sophisticated discourse interpretation function . Acknowledgements We
J12-4003 could be linked to form a coherent discourse interpretation ( this is similar to the idea
J03-4002 always been treated as elements of discourse interpretation . So the variables must be the
D14-1136 share the same refer - ence . The discourse interpretation function sem can be as simple
J03-4002 grammarfor discourse that facilitates discourse interpretation as a product of compositional
H91-1024 elegant approach to inference in discourse interpretation has been developed at a number
hide detail