J09-2002 improvements to the application to definition analysis . Currently , FrameNet roles
P88-1027 technique . In addition , a parser for definition analysis needs to be able to return partial
J09-2002 one developed specifically for definition analysis . Section 3 discusses the relation
W04-2116 Therefore , prior to running the definition analysis , the definitions are converted
J09-2002 inventory of relations used for definition analysis , as shown in Table 8 . The disambiguation
J09-2002 useful for other tasks besides definition analysis . This classifier was used to
J09-2002 derived from these in support of definition analysis , which is the motivation for
J87-3001 make it particularly suitable for definition analysis . Thus many LDOCE word sense
A92-1044 . This batch process is called definition analysis . The grammar , of course , must
J09-2002 relation inventory developed for definition analysis , illustrating how preposition
W04-0849 1998 ) ; and , for details on the definition analysis , see ( O’Hara , forthcoming
J09-2002 distinctions that are not relevant for definition analysis ( e.g. , cognizer and addressee
W04-0849 For the DictColl fea - tures , definition analysis ( O’Hara , forthcoming
W04-0849 similarity classes ; and 3 ) dictionary definition analysis . 1 Introduction Supervised systems
J87-3001 and necessary further research . DEFINITION ANALYSIS There are various possibilities
J09-2002 to be more readily tailored to definition analysis , especially because predicate
T87-1004 allowing a fairly close tuning of a definitions analysis program ( it turns out that there
J09-2002 knowledge-based approaches in dictionary definition analysis ( Wilks , Slator , and Guthrie
E87-1011 by fully integrating Alshawi 's definitions analysis program into the overall design
J87-3001 vocabulary . It is hoped to extend the definition analysis system so that it would attempt
hide detail