P95-1019 presents a model for engaging in collaborative negotiation to resolve conflicts in agents
J98-3002 allows the system to initiate collaborative negotiation with the user to resolve their
J98-3002 Second , an agent may initiate collaborative negotiation subdialogues when she detects
P95-1019 proposed beliefs and for engaging in collaborative negotiation to resolve the conflicts that
J98-3002 5 ) and ( 6 ) , C initiates a collaborative negotiation subdialogue in an attempt to
J98-3002 utterances ( 2 ) -- ( 4 ) ) or a collaborative negotiation subdialogue ( utterances ( 5
J98-3002 modify the proposal by initiating a collaborative negotiation subdialogue to resolve the agents
J98-3002 illustrate how CORE initiates collaborative negotiation to resolve a detected conflict
J98-3002 segments in which CORE initiated collaborative negotiation ( CN1 , CN2 , and CN3 ) , however
J98-3002 proposal . The purpose of such collaborative negotiation subdialogues is for the two agents
P95-1019 , the agents should engage in collaborative negotiation as an attempt to square away
J98-3002 , and 2 ) the system initiates collaborative negotiation to negotiate with the user to
P95-1019 ) the conflicts by engaging in collaborative negotiation to determine what should constitute
J98-3002 provide a mechanism for extended collaborative negotiation . On the other hand , our analysis
J98-3002 an architect . Thus U initiates collaborative negotiation by presenting a modified belief
J98-3002 ineffective . To evaluate our collaborative negotiation strategies , we analyzed the
J98-3002 another feature that distinguishes collaborative negotiation from argumentation and noncollaborative
J98-3002 . First , an agent engaging in collaborative negotiation does not insist on winning an
J98-3002 . This feature differentiates collaborative negotiation from argumentation ( Birnbaum
J98-3002 couple of features distinguish collaborative negotiation from argumentation and noncollaborative
hide detail