A92-1027 probably the nested loops of the CKY algorithm ( see , e.g. , Aho & Ullman
D10-1054 2003 ) . We utilize a standard CKY algorithm for decod - ing . Given a source
C04-1024 bit-vector based implementation of the CKY algorithm for large highly ambiguous grammars
D14-1107 sentence length . Unlike the cubic CKY algorithm typically used by chart parsers
D13-1022 which is simply a version of the CKY algorithm . Next consider a variant of
D11-1081 method instead of traditional CKY algorithm . Not surprisingly , the improvements
D11-1018 can also be performed using the CKY algorithm . Section 3 describes the feature
C04-1024 uses a modi ed version of the CKY algorithm allowing also chain rules ( rules
D11-1018 computed efficiently using the CKY algorithm . 2.3 Monolingual Parsing Model
C04-1024 . 2 Grammar Transformation The CKY algorithm requires a grammar in Chomsky
D11-1108 most probable derivation via the CKY algorithm . In principle the best translation
D08-1018 adopt an extended version of the CKY algorithm which can handle the unary productions
E95-1011 for PLPATR that generalizes the CKY algorithm ( Kasami , 1965 ; Younger , 1967
D08-1018 analysis of the running time of the CKY algorithm and simplify the problem by introducing
D12-1105 be easily integrated into the CKY algorithm for a single annotated grammar
D15-1122 most probable derivation via the CKY algorithm with a Viterbi approximation
D10-1054 contain variables . Because the CKY algorithm guarantees that the sub spans
D08-1018 known that the complexity of the CKY algorithm is O ( n3L ) . The constant L
E09-1037 For example , the probabilistic CKY algorithm ( run on sentence w1w2 ... wn
E12-1044 ( n3 ) time since it uses the CKY algorithm , and each cell in the CKY parse
hide detail